Thread (26 messages) 26 messages, 6 authors, 2026-05-28

Re: [PATCH net-next 00/10] docs: net: updates for old and cobwebbed docs

From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Date: 2026-05-27 14:48:41
Also in: linux-doc

On Tue, 26 May 2026 19:39:47 -0700 Randy Dunlap wrote:
On 5/26/26 6:15 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
quoted
On Tue, 26 May 2026 17:51:45 -0700 Randy Dunlap wrote:  
quoted
It's in today's linux-next (20260526), line 1950 of
include/linux/netdevice.h:  
linux-next is useful, but we try not to merge broken code, not just
notice it after the fact. So it'd be great if the fix made its way
to Linus and therefore propagate to subsystem -next trees, not just
linux-next.  
OK. I don't quite know what you mean by that, but I just checked the
current net-next tree and it's still there at line 1950.
Sorry, I'm talking about the regression in the kernel-doc _script_
which was recently fixed, and which hid the "excess kdoc" warnings. 
I'm guessing that it's fixed now in linux-next.
That's why you see the warning in linux-next and I don't in networking
trees. What I was trying to argue was that that script fix should be
sent to Linus, not sit in linux-next.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help