Thread (3 messages) 3 messages, 3 authors, 19d ago

Re: [PATCH net-next] rtnetlink: do not use RTNL in rtnl_af_register() and rtnl_af_unregister()

From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org
Date: 2026-05-23 00:40:25

Hello:

This patch was applied to netdev/net-next.git (main)
by Jakub Kicinski [off-list ref]:

On Thu, 21 May 2026 17:40:38 +0000 you wrote:
rtnl_af_lookup() does not rely on RTNL anymoe, remove the stale
ASSERT_RTNL().

Add a private spinlock (rtnl_af_ops_lock) to protect rtnl_af_ops
list instead of using RTNL.

Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>

[...]
Here is the summary with links:
  - [net-next] rtnetlink: do not use RTNL in rtnl_af_register() and rtnl_af_unregister()
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/b8de39a06535

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html

Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help