Re: [PATCH net 1/2] net/mlx5e: psp: Fix invalid access on PSP dev registration fail
From: Cosmin Ratiu <hidden>
Date: 2026-04-22 09:25:19
Also in:
linux-rdma, lkml
On Tue, 2026-04-21 at 11:32 -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
On Tue, 21 Apr 2026 17:34:32 +0000 Cosmin Ratiu wrote:quoted
quoted
No, the normal thing to do is to propagate errors. If you want to diverge from that _you_ should have a reason, a better reason than a vague "kernel can fail". I'd prefer for the driver to fail in an obvious way. Which will be immediately spotted by the operator, not 2 weeks later when 10% of the fleet is upgraded already. The only exception I'd make is to keep devlink registered in case the fix is to flash a different FW.In this case, PSP not working would be spotted on the next PSP dev- get op which produces zilch instead of working devices.When you have X vendors times Y device generations times Z FW versions in your fleet dev-get returning nothing is not a failure. It just means you're running on a machine that's not capable. Best you can do to spot a buggy kernel is to notice that the fraction of PSP traffic is decreasing over time. After significant portion of the fleet is already on the bad kernel.quoted
But I understand what you want. You'd like the netdevice to either be fully initialized with all supported+configured protocols or fail the open operation. No intermediate/partial states. This is a non- trivial refactor for mlx5, because mlx5_nic_enable() returns nothing. Refactoring seems possible though, its only caller is mlx5e_attach_netdev(), which returns errors. It's certainly not something that should be done for a net fix though. I have a series pending for net-next where the PSP configuration is hooked to mlx5e_psp_set_config(). I will look into implementing what you propose there and propagate errors. Meanwhile, do you want to take these fixes (1 and 2) or maybe just 2 for net or not?Can you call mlx5e_psp_cleanup() when register fails for now?
Done for the next version, currently undergoing testing. Cosmin.