Thread (3 messages) 3 messages, 2 authors, 2026-03-21

Re: [PATCH net-next] net: airoha: Rework the code flow in airoha_remove() and in airoha_probe() error path

From: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org>
Date: 2026-03-21 13:09:49
Also in: linux-arm-kernel, linux-mediatek

On Mar 21, Simon Horman wrote:
On Fri, Mar 20, 2026 at 09:42:28AM +0100, Lorenzo Bianconi wrote:
quoted
As suggested by Simon in [0], rework the code flow in airoha_remove()
and in the airoha_probe() error path in order to rely on a more common
approach un-registering configured net-devices first and destroying the
hw resources at the end of the code.
Introduce airoha_qdma_cleanup routine to release QDMA resources.

[0] https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20251214-airoha-fix-dev-registration-v1-1-860e027ad4c6@kernel.org/ (local)

Suggested-by: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/airoha/airoha_eth.c | 82 ++++++++++++++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 47 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/airoha/airoha_eth.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/airoha/airoha_eth.c
...
quoted
@@ -3028,7 +3044,7 @@ static int airoha_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 
 	err = airoha_hw_init(pdev, eth);
 	if (err)
-		goto error_hw_cleanup;
+		return err;
Hi Lorenzo,

AI generated review warns that eth->napi_dev is leaked here.
And that does seem to be the case.
Hi Simon,

right. I will fix it in v2.

Regards,
Lorenzo
quoted
 
 	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(eth->qdma); i++)
 		airoha_qdma_start_napi(&eth->qdma[i]);
...

Attachments

Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help