Re: [PATCH 1/2] ptp: split clock drivers into two subdirectories
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Date: 2026-03-24 02:16:47
Also in:
imx, linux-fpga, linux-s390, lkml
On Wed, 18 Mar 2026 15:33:29 +0800 Wen Gu wrote:
drivers/ptp/emulated/Kconfig | 61 +++++
drivers/ptp/emulated/Makefile | 11 +
drivers/ptp/{ => emulated}/ptp_kvm_arm.c | 0
drivers/ptp/{ => emulated}/ptp_kvm_common.c | 0
drivers/ptp/{ => emulated}/ptp_kvm_x86.c | 0
drivers/ptp/{ => emulated}/ptp_s390.c | 0
drivers/ptp/{ => emulated}/ptp_vmclock.c | 0
drivers/ptp/{ => emulated}/ptp_vmw.c | 0
drivers/ptp/ieee1588/Kconfig | 179 +++++++++++++
drivers/ptp/ieee1588/Makefile | 16 ++
drivers/ptp/{ => ieee1588}/ptp_clockmatrix.c | 0
drivers/ptp/{ => ieee1588}/ptp_clockmatrix.h | 0
drivers/ptp/{ => ieee1588}/ptp_dfl_tod.c | 0
drivers/ptp/{ => ieee1588}/ptp_dte.c | 0
drivers/ptp/{ => ieee1588}/ptp_fc3.c | 0
drivers/ptp/{ => ieee1588}/ptp_fc3.h | 0
drivers/ptp/{ => ieee1588}/ptp_idt82p33.c | 0
drivers/ptp/{ => ieee1588}/ptp_idt82p33.h | 0
drivers/ptp/{ => ieee1588}/ptp_ines.c | 0
drivers/ptp/{ => ieee1588}/ptp_mock.c | 0
drivers/ptp/{ => ieee1588}/ptp_netc.c | 0
drivers/ptp/{ => ieee1588}/ptp_ocp.c | 0
drivers/ptp/{ => ieee1588}/ptp_pch.c | 0
drivers/ptp/{ => ieee1588}/ptp_qoriq.c | 0
26 files changed, 296 insertions(+), 253 deletions(-)emulated sounds good but the ieee1588 doesn't sit well with me. IEEE1588 doesn't describe tickers and external signals. Let's leave them in the main directory? Or call it hw even if it's not 100% accurate? In MAINTAINERS you can exclude subdir with X: