On Tue, 17 Mar 2026 07:39:43 -0700 Konstantin Taranov wrote:
Make remove_adev() safe to call concurrently from the service reset
and PCI eject paths by using xchg() to atomically claim the adev
pointer. This prevents double auxiliary_device_delete/uninit when
hv_eject_device_work races with the service reset workqueue.
Really seems like you should add proper locking to these paths
instead. Are the accesses to is_suspended, rdma_teardown etc
really safe as is?
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/microsoft/mana/mana_en.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/microsoft/mana/mana_en.c
index 9017e806e..9ae5f01d8 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/microsoft/mana/mana_en.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/microsoft/mana/mana_en.c
@@ -3410,14 +3410,18 @@ static void adev_release(struct device *dev)
static void remove_adev(struct gdma_dev *gd)
{
- struct auxiliary_device *adev = gd->adev;
- int id = adev->id;
+ struct auxiliary_device *adev = xchg(&gd->adev, NULL);
nit: avoid falling functions with side effects as variable init
+ int id;
+
+ if (!adev)
+ return;