Thread (3 messages) 3 messages, 3 authors, 2026-03-18

Re: [PATCH 2/2] drbd: select CONFIG_NET_HANDSHAKE

From: "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>
Date: 2026-03-18 21:21:11
Also in: linux-block, lkml

On Wed, Mar 18, 2026, at 22:16, Christoph Böhmwalder wrote:
Am 18.03.26 um 11:48 schrieb Arnd Bergmann:
quoted
 config NET_HANDSHAKE_KUNIT_TEST
 	tristate "KUnit tests for the handshake upcall mechanism" if !KUNIT_ALL_TESTS
Thanks for the fix, I applied it to our drbd-next tree (which should end
up in linux-next).

I would prefer to squash these kinds of fixups to keep the history in
our patch series clean.
Arnd, does that work for you? How do you prefer we handle attribution?

Unfortunately I couldn't really find a clear precedence pattern for
this, how is this usually handled?
Whichever way works best for you. Some people care a lot about 
attribution for bugfixes, but I generally prefer a clean history
myself.

     Arnd
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help