Re: [PATCH 2/2] drbd: select CONFIG_NET_HANDSHAKE
From: "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>
Date: 2026-03-18 21:21:11
Also in:
linux-block, lkml
From: "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>
Date: 2026-03-18 21:21:11
Also in:
linux-block, lkml
On Wed, Mar 18, 2026, at 22:16, Christoph Böhmwalder wrote:
Am 18.03.26 um 11:48 schrieb Arnd Bergmann:
quoted
config NET_HANDSHAKE_KUNIT_TEST tristate "KUnit tests for the handshake upcall mechanism" if !KUNIT_ALL_TESTSThanks for the fix, I applied it to our drbd-next tree (which should end up in linux-next). I would prefer to squash these kinds of fixups to keep the history in our patch series clean. Arnd, does that work for you? How do you prefer we handle attribution? Unfortunately I couldn't really find a clear precedence pattern for this, how is this usually handled?
Whichever way works best for you. Some people care a lot about
attribution for bugfixes, but I generally prefer a clean history
myself.
Arnd