Re: [v1] net: fjes: Drop fjes_acpi_driver and rework initialization
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Date: 2026-03-18 13:00:12
Also in:
linux-acpi, lkml
On Tue, Mar 17, 2026 at 5:43 PM Simon Horman [off-list ref] wrote:
This is an AI-generated review of your patch. The human sending this email has considered the AI review valid, or at least plausible. For local reproduction steps see https://netdev-ai.bots.linux.dev/ai-local.html --- net: fjes: Drop fjes_acpi_driver and rework initialization This commit reworks the Fujitsu Extended Socket (fjes) Network Device driver initialization by removing the ACPI driver interface and creating the platform device directly during module initialization. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/2396510.ElGaqSPkdT@rafael.j.wysocki/ (local) [1]quoted
diff --git a/drivers/net/fjes/fjes_main.c b/drivers/net/fjes/fjes_main.c index b63965d9a1ba..efb399eb15e0 100644 --- a/drivers/net/fjes/fjes_main.c +++ b/drivers/net/fjes/fjes_main.c[ ... ]quoted
@@ -1518,16 +1506,7 @@ static int __init fjes_init_module(void) return result; } - result = acpi_bus_register_driver(&fjes_acpi_driver); - if (result < 0) - goto fail_acpi_driver; - return 0; - -fail_acpi_driver: - platform_driver_unregister(&fjes_driver); - fjes_dbg_exit(); - return result; }In fjes_init_module(), if platform_driver_register() fails, does this leak the platform device? Looking at the new code, the platform device is successfully registered earlier in the function: fjes_plat_dev = platform_device_register_full(&pdevinfo); ... if (IS_ERR(fjes_plat_dev)) return PTR_ERR(fjes_plat_dev); ... result = platform_driver_register(&fjes_driver); But when platform_driver_register() fails, the error path only calls fjes_dbg_exit() and returns: result = platform_driver_register(&fjes_driver); if (result < 0) { fjes_dbg_exit(); return result; } Since the module init fails, fjes_exit_module() will never run, so the platform_device_unregister() call there won't happen either. Should the error path call platform_device_unregister(fjes_plat_dev) before returning?
Yes, it should. I'll send a v2, thanks!