Re: [PATCH net-next v11] virtio_net: add page_pool support for buffer allocation
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Date: 2026-03-16 10:44:06
Also in:
lkml, virtualization
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Date: 2026-03-16 10:44:06
Also in:
lkml, virtualization
On Mon, Mar 16, 2026 at 05:56:20AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Tue, Mar 10, 2026 at 11:31:04AM -0700, Vishwanath Seshagiri wrote:quoted
@@ -5857,7 +5863,7 @@ static int virtnet_xsk_pool_enable(struct net_device *dev, /* In big_packets mode, xdp cannot work, so there is no need to * initialize xsk of rq. */ - if (vi->big_packets && !vi->mergeable_rx_bufs) + if (!vi->rq[qid].page_pool) return -ENOENT; if (qid >= vi->curr_queue_pairs)It seems that a qid that exceeds curr_queue_pairs would previously get -EINVAL and now gets -ENOENT.
Or maybe this if (qid >= vi->curr_queue_pairs) is dead code? I looked at it some more and I can't find a path where this triggers.
Maybe reorder the checks:
if (qid >= vi->curr_queue_pairs)
return -EINVAL;
/* In big_packets mode, xdp cannot work, so there is no need to
* initialize xsk of rq.
*/
if (!vi->rq[qid].page_pool)
return -ENOENT;
Alternatively I think we can completely drop this chunk: we already seem
to init page_pull at all times except for big packets mode, so the
current code is fine I think.
--
MST