Thread (21 messages) 21 messages, 6 authors, 2026-03-24

Re: [PATCH net-next v11] virtio_net: add page_pool support for buffer allocation

From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Date: 2026-03-16 10:44:06
Also in: lkml, virtualization

On Mon, Mar 16, 2026 at 05:56:20AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Tue, Mar 10, 2026 at 11:31:04AM -0700, Vishwanath Seshagiri wrote:
quoted
@@ -5857,7 +5863,7 @@ static int virtnet_xsk_pool_enable(struct net_device *dev,
 	/* In big_packets mode, xdp cannot work, so there is no need to
 	 * initialize xsk of rq.
 	 */
-	if (vi->big_packets && !vi->mergeable_rx_bufs)
+	if (!vi->rq[qid].page_pool)
 		return -ENOENT;
 
 	if (qid >= vi->curr_queue_pairs)


It seems that a qid that exceeds curr_queue_pairs would previously get
-EINVAL and now gets -ENOENT.
Or maybe this if (qid >= vi->curr_queue_pairs) is dead code?
I looked at it some more and I can't find a path where this
triggers.
Maybe reorder the checks:

        if (qid >= vi->curr_queue_pairs)
                return -EINVAL;

        /* In big_packets mode, xdp cannot work, so there is no need to
         * initialize xsk of rq.
         */ 
       if (!vi->rq[qid].page_pool)
               return -ENOENT;


Alternatively I think we can completely drop this chunk: we already seem
to init page_pull at all times except for big packets mode, so the
current code is fine I think.


-- 
MST
  
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help