Re: [PATCH net-next v3 2/6] mptcp: keep rcv_mwnd_seq in sync with subflow rcv_wnd
From: Simon Baatz <hidden>
Date: 2026-03-11 22:08:11
Also in:
linux-doc, linux-kselftest, lkml, mptcp
Hi Matt, On Wed, Mar 11, 2026 at 07:27:34PM +0100, Matthieu Baerts wrote:
Hi Simon, On 09/03/2026 09:02, Simon Baatz via B4 Relay wrote:quoted
From: Simon Baatz <redacted> MPTCP shares a receive window across subflows and applies it at the subflow level by adjusting each subflow's rcv_wnd when needed. With the new TCP tracking of the maximum advertised window sequence, rcv_mwnd_seq must stay consistent with these subflow-level rcv_wnd adjustments.Thank you for these modifications!quoted
Signed-off-by: Simon Baatz <redacted> --- net/mptcp/options.c | 6 ++++-- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)diff --git a/net/mptcp/options.c b/net/mptcp/options.c index 43df4293f58bfbd8a8df6bf24b9f15e0f9e238f6..8a1c5698983cff3082d68290626dd8f1e044527f 100644 --- a/net/mptcp/options.c +++ b/net/mptcp/options.c(...)quoted
@@ -1338,8 +1339,9 @@ static void mptcp_set_rwin(struct tcp_sock *tp, struct tcphdr *th) */ rcv_wnd_new = rcv_wnd_old; win = rcv_wnd_old - ack_seq; - tp->rcv_wnd = min_t(u64, win, U32_MAX); - new_win = tp->rcv_wnd; + new_win = min_t(u64, win, U32_MAX); + tp->rcv_wnd = new_win;Out of curiosity, why did you change the two lines above? (even if it makes sense, the diff is a bit confusing, and the commit message doesn't mention this :) )
I wanted to keep tcp_update_max_rcv_wnd_seq() calls close to the respective update sites (same pattern everywhere). In the original form tp->rcv_wnd = min_t(u64, win, U32_MAX); tcp_update_max_rcv_wnd_seq(tp); new_win = tp->rcv_wnd; the ordering suggests that tcp_update_max_rcv_wnd_seq() might modify tp->rcv_wnd. So, I changed it for legibility. Now, I realize it made the diff harder to read. I might have optimized the wrong metric here ;-)
quoted
+ tcp_update_max_rcv_wnd_seq(tp);This patch adding this new helper each time rcv_wnd is modified looks good to me: Reviewed-by: Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) <matttbe@kernel.org> Note: just in case a new version is needed, checkpatch reported an error in patch 4/6 because of a trailing whitespace (+ No space is necessary after a cast in patch 1/6), see: https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/actions/runs/22844479818
Thanks. I will change that if there is a v4. -- Simon Baatz [off-list ref]