[PATCH net v1] net/rose: fix NULL pointer dereference in rose_transmit_link on reconnect
From: Jiayuan Chen <jiayuan.chen@linux.dev>
Date: 2026-03-10 10:14:11
Also in:
linux-hams, lkml
Subsystem:
networking [general], the rest · Maintainers:
"David S. Miller", Eric Dumazet, Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni, Linus Torvalds
From: Jiayuan Chen <redacted> syzkaller reported a bug [1], and the reproducer is available at [2]. When rose_connect() is called a second time on an already-connecting socket, it overwrites rose->neighbour with the result of rose_get_neigh() without releasing the previous reference. If rose_get_neigh() returns NULL, the socket is left in an inconsistent state: rose->state remains ROSE_STATE_1 from the first connect while rose->neighbour is NULL. When the socket is subsequently closed, rose_release() sees ROSE_STATE_1 and calls rose_write_internal() -> rose_transmit_link(skb, NULL), causing a NULL pointer dereference when accessing neigh->loopback. Fix this by: 1. Releasing the old neighbour reference before attempting a reconnect 2. Resetting rose->state to ROSE_STATE_0 before the new connect attempt, so a failure leaves the socket in a clean state 3. Setting rose->neighbour to NULL in all error paths after rose_neigh_put() to prevent use-after-free on subsequent reconnects [1] https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=d00f90e0af54102fb271 [2] https://gist.github.com/mrpre/9e6779e0d13e2c66779b1653fef80516 Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2") Reported-by: syzbot+d00f90e0af54102fb271@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/69694d6f.050a0220.58bed.0027.GAE@google.com/T/ (local) Cc: Jiayuan Chen <jiayuan.chen@linux.dev> Signed-off-by: Jiayuan Chen <redacted> --- net/rose/af_rose.c | 11 +++++++++++ 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
diff --git a/net/rose/af_rose.c b/net/rose/af_rose.c
index 841d62481048..d9bf32ac3df3 100644
--- a/net/rose/af_rose.c
+++ b/net/rose/af_rose.c@@ -814,6 +814,14 @@ static int rose_connect(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr_unsized *uaddr, int sk->sk_state = TCP_CLOSE; sock->state = SS_UNCONNECTED; + /* Release previous neighbour ref if reconnecting */ + if (rose->neighbour) { + rose_neigh_put(rose->neighbour); + rose->neighbour = NULL; + } + + rose->state = ROSE_STATE_0; + rose->neighbour = rose_get_neigh(&addr->srose_addr, &cause, &diagnostic, 0); if (!rose->neighbour) {
@@ -825,6 +833,7 @@ static int rose_connect(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr_unsized *uaddr, int if (!rose->lci) { err = -ENETUNREACH; rose_neigh_put(rose->neighbour); + rose->neighbour = NULL; goto out_release; }
@@ -837,6 +846,7 @@ static int rose_connect(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr_unsized *uaddr, int if (!dev) { err = -ENETUNREACH; rose_neigh_put(rose->neighbour); + rose->neighbour = NULL; goto out_release; }
@@ -844,6 +854,7 @@ static int rose_connect(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr_unsized *uaddr, int if (!user) { err = -EINVAL; rose_neigh_put(rose->neighbour); + rose->neighbour = NULL; dev_put(dev); goto out_release; }
--
2.43.0