Re: [RFC net-next v2 2/6] ethtool: Add loopback GET/SET netlink implementation
From: Björn Töpel <bjorn@kernel.org>
Date: 2026-03-09 14:51:41
Also in:
linux-rdma, lkml
Björn Töpel [off-list ref] writes:
Maxime Chevallier [off-list ref] writes:quoted
Hi Björn, On 08/03/2026 13:40, Björn Töpel wrote:quoted
Add the kernel-side ETHTOOL_MSG_LOOPBACK_GET, ETHTOOL_MSG_LOOPBACK_SET, and ETHTOOL_MSG_LOOPBACK_NTF handlers using the standard ethnl_request_ops infrastructure. GET collects loopback entries from per-component helpers via loopback_get_entries(). SET parses the nested entry attributes, dispatches each to loopback_set_one(), and only sends a notification when the state is changed. No components are wired yet. Signed-off-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn@kernel.org>At a first glance, what I see is that you're using the GET ->doit method to retrieve an array of loopback entries. The pefered approach in that case is to use the GET ->dumpit command instead, issueing a netlink DUMP request to list all available loopback entities on a given netdev. If you want some reference on that, take a look at the phy.c + the 'perphy' helpers in net/ethtool/netlink.c The idea is that you can pass a netdev ifindex in the header of the DUMP request, which you can use to dump all loopbacks the passed netdev. You can also check the ethtool code itself, you'll see that when you use the "ethtool --show-phys eth0" command for example, it issues a DUMP request to the kernel.Ah, got it! Thanks!
Thanks for pointing this out! I like how using this can get rid of the fixed size array in struct ethtool_loopback_cfg, which had a bad smell to me. Thinking out loud -- Now, using a similar scheme for loopback requires some thought around the sub-iterator: Loopback has "multiple" sub-iterator: (component, [id], name)... or needs scheme to deal with one sub-iter, and loopback can share a lot of code with the perphy-functions. Björn