On 2026/3/6 10:41, Jakub Kicinski wrote:

On Fri, 27 Feb 2026 20:25:11 +0800 Wen Gu wrote:

quoted

As mentioned in RFC v1, the use cases for drivers in the emulated PHC category
are expected to be quite diverse, and not limited to the virtualization/guest
time sync use case. For example, existing drivers such as ptp_ocp [1] and
upcoming ones such as mhi_phc [2] are not related to virtualization use cases.

ptp_ocp is a real PCIe device with an atomic clock. mhi_phc is some
qualcomm fw-defined thing, so more closely mapping what you're doing.
ptp_ocp should probably stay under netdev, we maintain DPLL drivers,
too. Main thing we/I don't want to deal with is all the corporate NIH
virtualization excreta.

OK. ptp_ocp will be kept under netdev in the next version.