Re: [PATCH net v1] net/smc: fix NULL dereference and UAF in smc_tcp_syn_recv_sock()
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Date: 2026-03-07 03:56:59
Also in:
linux-rdma, linux-s390, lkml
On Sat, Mar 7, 2026 at 4:22 AM Jiayuan Chen [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Syzkaller reported a panic in smc_tcp_syn_recv_sock() [1]. smc_tcp_syn_recv_sock() is called in the TCP receive path (softirq) via icsk_af_ops->syn_recv_sock on the clcsock (TCP listening socket). It reads sk_user_data to get the smc_sock pointer. However, when the SMC listen socket is being closed concurrently, smc_close_active() sets clcsock->sk_user_data to NULL under sk_callback_lock, and then the smc_sock itself can be freed via sock_put() in smc_release(). This leads to two issues: 1) NULL pointer dereference: sk_user_data is NULL when accessed. 2) Use-after-free: sk_user_data is read as non-NULL, but the smc_sock is freed before its fields (e.g., queued_smc_hs, ori_af_ops) are accessed. The race window looks like this: CPU A (softirq) CPU B (process ctx) tcp_v4_rcv() TCP_NEW_SYN_RECV: sk = req->rsk_listener sock_hold(sk) /* No lock on listener */ smc_close_active(): write_lock_bh(cb_lock) sk_user_data = NULL write_unlock_bh(cb_lock) ... smc_clcsock_release() sock_put(smc->sk) x2 -> smc_sock freed! tcp_check_req() smc_tcp_syn_recv_sock(): smc = user_data(sk) -> NULL or dangling smc->queued_smc_hs -> crash! Note that the clcsock and smc_sock are two independent objects with separate refcounts. TCP stack holds a reference on the clcsock, which keeps it alive, but this does NOT prevent the smc_sock from being freed. Fix this by taking sk_callback_lock to read sk_user_data and then sock_hold(&smc->sk) under the lock to pin the smc_sock. The lock is released immediately after sock_hold(), rather than being held for the entire function, to avoid holding it across ori_af_ops->syn_recv_sock() which creates child sockets and could risk deadlocks with nested lock ordering. sock_put(&smc->sk) is called on all exit paths after the hold. [1] https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=827ae2bfb3a3529333e9 Fixes: 8270d9c21041 ("net/smc: Limit backlog connections") Reported-by: syzbot+827ae2bfb3a3529333e9@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/67eaf9b8.050a0220.3c3d88.004a.GAE@google.com/T/ (local) Signed-off-by: Jiayuan Chen <jiayuan.chen@linux.dev> --- net/smc/af_smc.c | 9 +++++++++ 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)diff --git a/net/smc/af_smc.c b/net/smc/af_smc.c index d0119afcc6a1..21218b9b0f9a 100644 --- a/net/smc/af_smc.c +++ b/net/smc/af_smc.c@@ -131,7 +131,14 @@ static struct sock *smc_tcp_syn_recv_sock(const struct sock *sk, struct smc_sock *smc; struct sock *child; + read_lock_bh(&((struct sock *)sk)->sk_callback_lock);
This will not survive a SYN flood attack. Please use RCU instead.
smc = smc_clcsock_user_data(sk);
+ if (!smc) {
+ read_unlock_bh(&((struct sock *)sk)->sk_callback_lock);
+ return NULL;
+ }
+ sock_hold(&smc->sk);
If you must take a refcount, use
if (!refcount_inc_not_zero(&smc->sk->sk_refcnt)) {
rcu_read_unlock();
return NULL;
}
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
+ read_unlock_bh(&((struct sock *)sk)->sk_callback_lock); if (READ_ONCE(sk->sk_ack_backlog) + atomic_read(&smc->queued_smc_hs) > sk->sk_max_ack_backlog)@@ -153,11 +160,13 @@ static struct sock *smc_tcp_syn_recv_sock(const struct sock *sk, if (inet_csk(child)->icsk_af_ops == inet_csk(sk)->icsk_af_ops) inet_csk(child)->icsk_af_ops = smc->ori_af_ops; } + sock_put(&smc->sk); return child; drop: dst_release(dst); tcp_listendrop(sk); + sock_put(&smc->sk); return NULL; } --2.43.0