Thread (3 messages) 3 messages, 2 authors, 2026-04-01

Re: [PATCH v2 net-next] net: add sysctl to toggle napi_consume_skb() alien skb defer

From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Date: 2026-03-31 11:39:44

On 3/27/26 4:33 PM, Jason Xing wrote:
Commit e20dfbad8aab ("net: fix napi_consume_skb() with alien skbs")
defers freeing of alien SKBs (alloc_cpu != current cpu) via
skb_attempt_defer_free() on the TX completion path to reduce cross-NUMA
SLUB spinlock contention to improve multi-queue UDP workloads.

However, this unconditionally impacts the napi_skb_cache fast recycle
path for single-flow / few-flow workloads (e.g. AF_XDP benchmarks[1]):
when the TX completion NAPI CPU differs from the SKB allocation CPU,
SKBs are deferred instead of being returned to the local napi_skb_cache,
forcing RX allocations back to the slow slab path.

The existing net.core.skb_defer_max=0 could disable this, but it is a
global switch that also disables the defer mechanism in TCP/UDP/MPTCP
recvmsg paths, losing its positive SLUB locality benefits there. AF_XDP
can co-exist with other protocols. That's the reason why I gave up
reusing skb_defer_disable_key. Besides, if the defer path is disabled,
that means TCP/UDP/MPTCP in process path will trigger directly freeing
skb with enabling/disabling bottom half(in kfree_skb_napi_cache())
which could affect others. So my thinking is not to touch this path.

Add a dedicated sysctl net.core.napi_consume_skb_defer backed by a
static key to selectively control the alien skb defer feature. Let
users decide which is the best fit for their own requirements.

This patch also avoids touching local_bh* pair(in kfree_skb_napi_cache())
to minimize the overhead.

[1]: taskset -c 0 ./xdpsock -i enp2s0f1 -q 1 -t -S -s 64
1) sysctl -w net.core.napi_consume_skb_defer=1 (as default)
 sock0@enp2s0f1:1 txonly xdp-skb
                   pps            pkts           1.00
rx                 0              0
tx                 1,851,950      20,397,952

2)sysctl -w net.core.napi_consume_skb_defer=0
 sock0@enp2s0f1:1 txonly xdp-skb
                   pps            pkts           1.00
rx                 0              0
tx                 1,985,067      25,530,432

For AF_XDP scenario, it turns out to be around 6.6% improvement.
I'm not a big fan of multiple tunables around the same feature, but
possibly here the use-case extends beyond AF_XDP right? Do you observe
some measurable positive delta even with UDP? Possibly even with TCP,
when the bottleneck is the sender?

More data would be helpful.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Signed-off-by: Jason Xing <redacted>
---
V2
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260326144249.97213-1-kerneljasonxing@gmail.com/ (local)
1. reuse proc_do_static_key() (Eric)
2. add doc (Stan)
---
 Documentation/admin-guide/sysctl/net.rst | 13 +++++++++++++
 net/core/net-sysfs.h                     |  1 +
 net/core/skbuff.c                        |  5 ++++-
 net/core/sysctl_net_core.c               |  7 +++++++
 4 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/sysctl/net.rst b/Documentation/admin-guide/sysctl/net.rst
index 0724a793798f..42e06f93306f 100644
--- a/Documentation/admin-guide/sysctl/net.rst
+++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/sysctl/net.rst
@@ -368,6 +368,19 @@ by the cpu which allocated them.
 
 Default: 128
 
+napi_consume_skb_defer
+----------------------
+When set to 1 (default), napi_consume_skb() defers freeing SKBs whose
+allocation CPU differs from the current CPU via skb_attempt_defer_free().
+This reduces cross-NUMA SLUB spinlock contention for multi-queue workloads.
+
+Setting this to 0 disables the defer path in napi_consume_skb() only,
+allowing SKBs to be returned to the local napi_skb_cache immediately.
+This can benefit single-flow or few-flow workloads (e.g. AF_XDP TX)
+where the defer detour hurts the fast recycle path.
I think it should be clarified that skb_defer_max takes priority, i.e.
no defer with skb_defer_max == 0. Also it would be great if you could
additional extend skb_defer_max documentation noting that 0 disable such
feature.

Thanks,

Paolo
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help