Thread (16 messages) 16 messages, 5 authors, 2026-02-19

Re: [PATCH net-next v3 1/3] dt-bindings: sram: qcom,imem: Allow modem-tables subnode

From: Konrad Dybcio <hidden>
Date: 2026-02-18 11:05:07
Also in: linux-arm-msm, linux-devicetree, lkml

On 2/17/26 9:25 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On Tue, Feb 17, 2026 at 02:30:31PM +0100, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
quoted
From: Konrad Dybcio <redacted>

The IP Accelerator hardware/firmware owns a sizeable region within the
IMEM, named 'modem-tables', containing various packet processing
configuration data.

It's not actually accessed by the OS, although we have to IOMMU-map it
with the IPA device, so that presumably the firmware can act upon it.

Allow it as a subnode of IMEM.
You do not have compatible, so rely on the node name as ABI, which is
fine in general but... I do not see usage of it in the driver. Why do
you need to define modem-tables child then?
I don't really *need* the node name to be an ABI. However, the current
binding for IMEM only allows a named "pil-reloc@.." subnode (which is
consumed via of_find_compatible_node() in the remoteproc subsystem) so I
figured the intention was to keep the list of allowed subnodes strictly
moderated

If you'd prefer a blanket pattern declaration with say '^[a-z]@[0-9a-z]+$'
with just a reg requirement inside, I'm fine with that too

Konrad
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help