Re: [PATCH] vmw_vsock: bypass false-positive Wnonnull warning with gcc-16 | netdev | Ratatoskr

[PATCH] vmw_vsock: bypass false-positive Wnonnull warning with gcc-16 · Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org> · 2026-02-03
Re: [PATCH] vmw_vsock: bypass false-positive Wnonnull warning with gcc-16 · Bobby Eshleman <hidden> · 2026-02-03
Re: [PATCH] vmw_vsock: bypass false-positive Wnonnull warning with gcc-16 · Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com> · 2026-02-04
Re: [PATCH] vmw_vsock: bypass false-positive Wnonnull warning with gcc-16 · Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> · 2026-02-05
Re: [PATCH] vmw_vsock: bypass false-positive Wnonnull warning with gcc-16 · Bryan Tan <bryan-bt.tan@broadcom.com> · 2026-02-04
Re: [PATCH] vmw_vsock: bypass false-positive Wnonnull warning with gcc-16 · patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org · 2026-02-05

Re: [PATCH] vmw_vsock: bypass false-positive Wnonnull warning with gcc-16

From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Date: 2026-02-05 02:41:18
Also in: lkml, virtualization

On Wed, 4 Feb 2026 12:29:44 +0100 Stefano Garzarella wrote:

Not sure if it's net or net-next material, maybe net to avoid the 
warning/error on v6.19 too ?

I think net-next. I assume people who build with werror like pain, 
and we need to be inclusive.