On Tue, Feb 03, 2026 at 02:54:38PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:

On Tue, 3 Feb 2026 12:18:54 +0100 Paolo Abeni wrote:

quoted

It looks like patch 3/3 depends on 1/3 but it should land in a different
tree, as patches 1 && 2 looks suitable for 'net-next' and 3/3 should
probably go via the arm/freescale tree.

We either need explicit ack from freescale maintainers or this should be
split across subtrees, right?

FWIW normally we don't touch the dts patch at all, unless the
maintainer chimes in and tells us to take it. No waiting for acks.
Off the top of my head us taking dts patches only happens if 
the person posting the patch _is_ the platform maintainer..

For this series we're waiting for the bindings to be reviewed.

Ugh.  Crap.  Rob already reviewed them.  I included his Reviewed-by tag
in v5 but I accidentally removed it that from v6.  I'm so sorry.

https://lore.kernel.org/all/939fdaf94038613486bdbba510a92a1e57e18c71.1769592679.git.dan.carpenter@linaro.org/ (local)

regards,
dan carpenter