The 15 patch limit is intended by the maintainers to cover
all outstanding patches on the mailing list on a per-tree basis.
Not just those in a single patchset. Document this practice accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
---
Changes in v2:
- Clarify that the limit is per-tree. (Jakub)
- Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260113-15-minutes-of-fame-v1-1-0806b418c6fd@kernel.org (local)
---
Documentation/process/maintainer-netdev.rst | 12 ++++++++++++
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/process/maintainer-netdev.rst b/Documentation/process/maintainer-netdev.rst
index 989192421cc9db6c93c816f2dfb7afbe48dd25fc..6bce4507d5d3136270bbf552880451e08b137b61 100644
--- a/Documentation/process/maintainer-netdev.rst
+++ b/Documentation/process/maintainer-netdev.rst
@@ -363,6 +363,18 @@ just do it. As a result, a sequence of smaller series gets merged quicker and
with better review coverage. Re-posting large series also increases the mailing
list traffic.
+Limit patches outstanding on mailing list
+-----------------------------------------
+
+Avoid having more than 15 patches, across all series, outstanding for
+review on the mailing list for a single tree. In other words, a maximum of
+15 patches under review on net, and a maximum of 15 patches under review on
+net-next.
+
+This limit is intended to focus developer effort on testing patches before
+upstream review. Aiding the quality of upstream submissions, and easing the
+load on reviewers.
+
.. _rcs:
Local variable ordering ("reverse xmas tree", "RCS")