Thread (2 messages) 2 messages, 2 authors, 2026-01-29

Re: [PATCH RFC v2 2/2] virtio-net: support receive timestamp

From: Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: 2026-01-29 11:12:19
Also in: lkml, virtualization

Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)

On Thu, 29 Jan 2026 11:08:27 +0100, Steffen Trumtrar [off-list ref] wrote:
Hi,

On 2026-01-29 at 17:48 +08, Xuan Zhuo [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Since patch #1 used this struct, this one should be placed first in the series.
oh, you are right, the order should be the other way around.
quoted
Also, has the virtio specification process accepted such a draft proposal?
I haven't sent the draft yet, because I'm unsure if I understood the way this should be implemented with the flow filter correctly.
If the direction is correct, I'd try and get the specification process going again.
(That is not that easy, if you're not used to it and not that deep into the whole virtio universe ;))

There have been many historical attempts in this area- you may want to take a
look first.

Thanks.

Best regards,
Steffen

--
Pengutronix e.K.                | Dipl.-Inform. Steffen Trumtrar |
Steuerwalder Str. 21            | https://www.pengutronix.de/    |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany       | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0       |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686| Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555    |
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help