Re: [net-next,v20,7/7] net: mtip: Extend the L2 switch driver for imx287 with bridge operations
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Date: 2026-01-28 02:26:02
Also in:
imx, linux-arm-kernel, linux-devicetree, lkml
This is an AI-generated review of your patch. The human sending this email has considered the AI review valid, or at least plausible. For local reproduction steps see https://netdev-ai.bots.linux.dev/ai-local.html --- net: mtip: Extend the L2 switch driver for imx287 with bridge operations This patch adds bridge operations support to the MTIP L2 switch driver, enabling hardware offloading for packet switching when a bridge is created on the switch interfaces.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/mtipsw/mtipl2sw_br.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/mtipsw/mtipl2sw_br.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..f961b9cc4e6a --- /dev/null +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/mtipsw/mtipl2sw_br.c
[ ... ]
+static int mtip_ndev_port_link(struct net_device *ndev,
+ struct net_device *br_ndev,
+ struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
+{
+ struct mtip_ndev_priv *priv = netdev_priv(ndev), *other_priv;
+ struct switch_enet_private *fep = priv->fep;
+ struct net_device *other_ndev;
+ int err;
+
+ /* Check if one port of MTIP switch is already bridged */
+ if (fep->br_members && !fep->br_offload) {
+ /* Get the second bridge ndev */
+ other_ndev = fep->ndev[fep->br_members - 1];
+ other_priv = netdev_priv(other_ndev);
+ if (other_priv->master_dev != br_ndev) {
+ NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack,
+ "L2 offloading only possible for the same bridge!");
+ return notifier_from_errno(-EOPNOTSUPP);^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Should this return -EOPNOTSUPP instead of notifier_from_errno(-EOPNOTSUPP)? The caller mtip_netdevice_event() already wraps the return value with notifier_from_errno(ret), so double-wrapping corrupts the return value. Looking at similar drivers like cpsw_new.c (cpsw_netdevice_port_link), the pattern is to return raw errno values here and let the event handler do the conversion.
+ }
+
+ fep->br_offload = 1;
+ mtip_switch_dis_port_separation(fep);
+ mtip_clear_atable(fep);
+ }
+
+ if (!priv->master_dev)
+ priv->master_dev = br_ndev;
+
+ fep->br_members |= BIT(priv->portnum - 1);
+
+ err = switchdev_bridge_port_offload(ndev, ndev, NULL, NULL, NULL,
+ false, extack);
+ if (err) {
+ dev_err(&ndev->dev, "can't offload bridge port %s [err: %d]\n",
+ ndev->name, err);
+ return err;
+ }If switchdev_bridge_port_offload() fails, the state changes made earlier in the function (br_offload, br_members, master_dev, and the hardware configuration via mtip_switch_dis_port_separation and mtip_clear_atable) are not rolled back. Looking at cpsw_new.c for reference, it modifies br_members after the switchdev call succeeds, avoiding the need for rollback. Could the state updates here be reordered to happen after switchdev_bridge_port_offload() returns successfully? [ ... ]
+static int mtip_netdevice_event(struct notifier_block *unused,
+ unsigned long event, void *ptr)
+{[ ... ]
+ return notifier_from_errno(ret); +}
[ ... ]