Thread (5 messages) 5 messages, 5 authors, 2026-01-27

Re: [PATCH net-next] net: alacritech: Use u64_stats_t with u64_stats_sync properly

From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Date: 2026-01-26 10:11:21
Also in: lkml

On Mon, Jan 26, 2026 at 12:23 AM Jakub Kicinski [off-list ref] wrote:
On Fri, 23 Jan 2026 02:51:07 +0800 David Yang wrote:
quoted
On 64bit arches, struct u64_stats_sync is empty and provides no help
against load/store tearing. Convert to u64_stats_t to ensure atomic
operations.
Eric, could you comment if this matters? I expect David may send a
non-trivial number of these, I want to make sure we're making good
use of everyone's time here. 64b accesses are not torn on 64b arches,
and never used for control flow.
I  added u64_stats_add()/u64_stats_inc() back in 2019, and never bothered
sending dozens of patches.

Presumably compilers could be really dumb back then, I am not sure
this is still the case today.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help