Re: [PATCH v5 10/11] dt-bindings: net: sparx5: do not require phys when RGMII is used

[PATCH v5 00/11] Add support for Microchip LAN969x · Robert Marko <robert.marko@sartura.hr> · 2026-01-15
[PATCH v5 01/11] dt-bindings: mfd: atmel,sama5d2-flexcom: add microchip,lan9691-flexcom · Robert Marko <robert.marko@sartura.hr> · 2026-01-15
[PATCH v5 02/11] dt-bindings: serial: atmel,at91-usart: add microchip,lan9691-usart · Robert Marko <robert.marko@sartura.hr> · 2026-01-15
[PATCH v5 03/11] dt-bindings: rng: atmel,at91-trng: add microchip,lan9691-trng · Robert Marko <robert.marko@sartura.hr> · 2026-01-15
[PATCH v5 04/11] dt-bindings: crypto: atmel,at91sam9g46-aes: add microchip,lan9691-aes · Robert Marko <robert.marko@sartura.hr> · 2026-01-15
[PATCH v5 05/11] dt-bindings: crypto: atmel,at91sam9g46-sha: add microchip,lan9691-sha · Robert Marko <robert.marko@sartura.hr> · 2026-01-15
[PATCH v5 06/11] dt-bindings: pinctrl: pinctrl-microchip-sgpio: add LAN969x · Robert Marko <robert.marko@sartura.hr> · 2026-01-15
Re: [PATCH v5 06/11] dt-bindings: pinctrl: pinctrl-microchip-sgpio: add LAN969x · Linus Walleij <linusw@kernel.org> · 2026-01-21
Re: [PATCH v5 06/11] dt-bindings: pinctrl: pinctrl-microchip-sgpio: add LAN969x · Robert Marko <robert.marko@sartura.hr> · 2026-01-22
Re: [PATCH v5 06/11] dt-bindings: pinctrl: pinctrl-microchip-sgpio: add LAN969x · Linus Walleij <linusw@kernel.org> · 2026-01-27
[PATCH v5 07/11] arm64: dts: microchip: add LAN969x clock header file · Robert Marko <robert.marko@sartura.hr> · 2026-01-15
Re: [PATCH v5 07/11] arm64: dts: microchip: add LAN969x clock header file · claudiu beznea <claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev> · 2026-01-16
[PATCH v5 08/11] arm64: dts: microchip: add LAN969x support · Robert Marko <robert.marko@sartura.hr> · 2026-01-15
Re: [PATCH v5 08/11] arm64: dts: microchip: add LAN969x support · Daniel Machon <daniel.machon@microchip.com> · 2026-02-09
[PATCH v5 09/11] dt-bindings: arm: AT91: document EV23X71A board · Robert Marko <robert.marko@sartura.hr> · 2026-01-15
[PATCH v5 10/11] dt-bindings: net: sparx5: do not require phys when RGMII is used · Robert Marko <robert.marko@sartura.hr> · 2026-01-15
Re: [PATCH v5 10/11] dt-bindings: net: sparx5: do not require phys when RGMII is used · "Rob Herring (Arm)" <robh@kernel.org> · 2026-01-21
Re: [PATCH v5 10/11] dt-bindings: net: sparx5: do not require phys when RGMII is used · Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> · 2026-01-21
[PATCH v5 11/11] arm64: dts: microchip: add EV23X71A board · Robert Marko <robert.marko@sartura.hr> · 2026-01-15
Re: [PATCH v5 11/11] arm64: dts: microchip: add EV23X71A board · Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev> · 2026-01-18
Re: [PATCH v5 11/11] arm64: dts: microchip: add EV23X71A board · Daniel Machon <daniel.machon@microchip.com> · 2026-02-09
Re: [PATCH v5 00/11] Add support for Microchip LAN969x · Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> · 2026-01-31

From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Date: 2026-01-21 02:38:57
Also in: linux-arm-kernel, linux-crypto, linux-devicetree, linux-gpio, linux-serial, linux-spi, lkml

On Thu, 15 Jan 2026 12:37:35 +0100 Robert Marko wrote:

LAN969x has 2 dedicated RGMII ports, so regular SERDES lanes are not used
for RGMII.

So, lets not require phys to be defined when any of the rgmii phy-modes are
set.

Applied, thanks!

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread
`k`	previous message in thread
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help