Thread (30 messages) 30 messages, 3 authors, 2026-01-20

RE: [PATCH v2 net-next 12/14] net: fec: add fec_alloc_rxq_buffers_pp() to allocate buffers from page pool

From: Wei Fang <wei.fang@nxp.com>
Date: 2026-01-17 02:16:23
Also in: bpf, imx, lkml

On Fri, Jan 16, 2026 at 03:40:25PM +0800, Wei Fang wrote:
quoted
Currently, the buffers of RX queue are allocated from the page pool.
In the subsequent patches to support XDP zero copy, the RX buffers
will be allocated from the UMEM. Therefore, extract
fec_alloc_rxq_buffers_pp() from fec_enet_alloc_rxq_buffers() and we
will add another helper to allocate RX buffers from UMEM for the XDP zero
copy mode.
quoted
Signed-off-by: Wei Fang <wei.fang@nxp.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_main.c | 78
++++++++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 54 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_main.c
b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_main.c
index a418f0153d43..68aa94dd9487 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_main.c
@@ -3435,6 +3435,24 @@ static void fec_xdp_rxq_info_unreg(struct
fec_enet_priv_rx_q *rxq)
quoted
 	}
 }

+static void fec_free_rxq_buffers(struct fec_enet_priv_rx_q *rxq) {
+	int i;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < rxq->bd.ring_size; i++) {
+		struct page *page = rxq->rx_buf[i];
+
+		if (!page)
+			continue;
+
+		page_pool_put_full_page(rxq->page_pool, page, false);
+		rxq->rx_buf[i] = NULL;
+	}
+
+	page_pool_destroy(rxq->page_pool);
+	rxq->page_pool = NULL;
+}
+
 static void fec_enet_free_buffers(struct net_device *ndev)  {
 	struct fec_enet_private *fep = netdev_priv(ndev); @@ -3448,16
+3466,10 @@ static void fec_enet_free_buffers(struct net_device *ndev)
 		rxq = fep->rx_queue[q];

 		fec_xdp_rxq_info_unreg(rxq);
-
-		for (i = 0; i < rxq->bd.ring_size; i++)
-			page_pool_put_full_page(rxq->page_pool, rxq->rx_buf[i],
-						false);
+		fec_free_rxq_buffers(rxq);

 		for (i = 0; i < XDP_STATS_TOTAL; i++)
 			rxq->stats[i] = 0;
-
-		page_pool_destroy(rxq->page_pool);
-		rxq->page_pool = NULL;
 	}

 	for (q = 0; q < fep->num_tx_queues; q++) { @@ -3556,22 +3568,18 @@
static int fec_enet_alloc_queue(struct net_device *ndev)
 	return ret;
 }

-static int
-fec_enet_alloc_rxq_buffers(struct net_device *ndev, unsigned int
queue)
+static int fec_alloc_rxq_buffers_pp(struct fec_enet_private *fep,
+				    struct fec_enet_priv_rx_q *rxq)
 {
-	struct fec_enet_private *fep = netdev_priv(ndev);
-	struct fec_enet_priv_rx_q *rxq;
+	struct bufdesc *bdp = rxq->bd.base;
 	dma_addr_t phys_addr;
-	struct bufdesc	*bdp;
 	struct page *page;
 	int i, err;

-	rxq = fep->rx_queue[queue];
-	bdp = rxq->bd.base;
-
 	err = fec_enet_create_page_pool(fep, rxq);
 	if (err < 0) {
-		netdev_err(ndev, "%s failed queue %d (%d)\n", __func__, queue, err);
+		netdev_err(fep->netdev, "%s failed queue %d (%d)\n",
+			   __func__, rxq->bd.qid, err);
 		return err;
 	}
@@ -3590,8 +3598,10 @@ fec_enet_alloc_rxq_buffers(struct net_device
*ndev, unsigned int queue)

 	for (i = 0; i < rxq->bd.ring_size; i++) {
 		page = page_pool_dev_alloc_pages(rxq->page_pool);
-		if (!page)
-			goto err_alloc;
+		if (!page) {
+			err = -ENOMEM;
+			goto free_rx_buffers;
look like this part is bug fix, miss set err to -ENOMEM
This is not a bug fix, the previous logic returned "-ENOMEM" directly
at the err_alloc label, see below.

err_alloc:
	fec_enet_free_buffers(ndev);
	return -ENOMEM;
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help