Re: [PATCH net-next 07/15] mfd: core: add ability for cells to probe on a custom parent OF node
From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Date: 2026-01-15 09:35:52
Also in:
lkml
From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Date: 2026-01-15 09:35:52
Also in:
lkml
Hi Lee, On Fri, Jan 09, 2026 at 02:14:32PM +0200, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
quoted
When I've thought about replacing the existing occurrences of the MFD API being used outside of drivers/mfd, I have often thought of a platform_add_device_simple() call which I believe would do what most people of these use-cases actually want.Would this platform_add_device_simple() share or duplicate code with mfd_add_devices()? Why not just liberalize mfd_add_devices() (the simplest solution)?
Sorry to nag you, but I would like to have a clear image of which way this patch set needs to be heading for v2. My understanding is that you're pushing for platform_device_add() while not completely rejecting that MFD could be the correct model for this switch's sub-devices.