Thread (45 messages) 45 messages, 7 authors, 2026-01-15

Re: [PATCH net-next 07/15] mfd: core: add ability for cells to probe on a custom parent OF node

From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Date: 2026-01-15 09:35:52
Also in: lkml

Hi Lee,

On Fri, Jan 09, 2026 at 02:14:32PM +0200, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
quoted
When I've thought about replacing the existing occurrences of the MFD
API being used outside of drivers/mfd, I have often thought of a
platform_add_device_simple() call which I believe would do what most
people of these use-cases actually want.
Would this platform_add_device_simple() share or duplicate code with
mfd_add_devices()? Why not just liberalize mfd_add_devices() (the
simplest solution)?
Sorry to nag you, but I would like to have a clear image of which way
this patch set needs to be heading for v2. My understanding is that
you're pushing for platform_device_add() while not completely rejecting
that MFD could be the correct model for this switch's sub-devices.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help