On Tue, Jan 13, 2026 at 12:00:20PM +0100, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
When the MT7530 switch is configured as an interrupt-controller it
also needs an interrupt but, in this case, only "interrupts" was
allowed.
Some devicetrees instead use the interrupts-extended property as a
shorter form, and in place of "interrupts" and "interrupt-parent",
as an equivalent.
For this reason, when interrupt-controller is present, depend on
either `interrupts` or `interrupts-extended`; this also resolves
some dtbs_check warnings.
Signed-off-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
---
.../devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/mediatek,mt7530.yaml | 7 +++++--
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/mediatek,mt7530.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/mediatek,mt7530.yaml
index 815a90808901..ffeb8d5836fe 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/mediatek,mt7530.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/mediatek,mt7530.yaml
@@ -279,8 +279,11 @@ allOf:
- resets
- reset-names
- - dependencies:
- interrupt-controller: [ interrupts ]
+ - anyOf:
+ - dependencies:
+ interrupt-controller: [ interrupts ]
+ - dependencies:
+ interrupt-controller: [ interrupts-extended ]
We already fixup this case:
dependencies:
interrupts: ...
And there's a few other cases like yours. So I've pushed a dtschema
change to handle this case.
Rob