Re: [PATCH RFC mlx5-next 0/1] net/mlx5e: Expose physical received bits counters to ethtool
From: Kenta Akagi <hidden>
Date: 2026-01-13 11:04:23
Also in:
linux-rdma, lkml
On 2026/01/13 15:43, Tariq Toukan wrote:
On 13/01/2026 8:31, Tariq Toukan wrote:quoted
On 12/01/2026 9:03, Kenta Akagi wrote:quoted
Hi, I would like to measure the cable BER on ConnectX. According to the documentation[1][2], there are counters that can be used for this purpose: rx_corrected_bits_phy, rx_pcs_symbol_err_phy and rx_bits_phy. However, rx_bits_phy does not show up in ethtool statistics. This patch exposes the PPCNT phy_received_bits as rx_bits_phy. On a ConnectX-5 with 25Gbase connection, it works as expected. On the other hand, although I have not verified it, in an 800Gbps environment rx_bits_phy would likely overflow after about 124 days. Since I cannot judge whether this is acceptable, I am posting this as an RFC first.Hi, This is a 64-bits counter so no overflow is expected.Sorry, ignore my comment, your numbers make sense. Maybe it's ~248 days, but same idea.
Hi, thank you for checking. Ah, it seems I didn't realize it was unsigned, and I also forgot to include the expression. Sorry about that. Yes - at 800 Gbps, 0xFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF / (800 * (2^30) * 86400) = 248.55 days, so it will overflow. In practice, is it possible to expose this as a statistic via ethtool? Or is there some other value that could be exposed for BER calculation - e.g., a register that indicates the elapsed seconds since link-up? Thanks.
quoted
quoted
[1] commit 8ce3b586faa4 ("net/mlx5: Add counter information to mlx5 driver documentation") [2] https://docs.kernel.org/networking/device_drivers/ethernet/ mellanox/mlx5/counters.html Kenta Akagi (1): net/mlx5e: Expose physical received bits counters to ethtool drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_stats.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)