Re: [PATCH bpf-next v5 1/4] bpf: crypto: Use the correct destructor kfunc type
From: kernel test robot <hidden>
Date: 2026-01-10 18:50:19
Also in:
bpf, lkml, oe-kbuild-all
Hi Sami, kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings: [auto build test WARNING on 5714ca8cba5ed736f3733663c446cbee63a10a64] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Sami-Tolvanen/bpf-crypto-Use-the-correct-destructor-kfunc-type/20260110-162850 base: 5714ca8cba5ed736f3733663c446cbee63a10a64 patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260110082548.113748-7-samitolvanen%40google.com patch subject: [PATCH bpf-next v5 1/4] bpf: crypto: Use the correct destructor kfunc type config: sh-randconfig-r133-20260110 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260111/202601110205.4dwPV9eI-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: sh4-linux-gcc (GCC) 13.4.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260111/202601110205.4dwPV9eI-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot [off-list ref] | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202601110205.4dwPV9eI-lkp@intel.com/ (local) sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)
quoted
kernel/bpf/crypto.c:264:18: sparse: sparse: symbol 'bpf_crypto_ctx_release_dtor' was not declared. Should it be static?
vim +/bpf_crypto_ctx_release_dtor +264 kernel/bpf/crypto.c
263
> 264 __bpf_kfunc void bpf_crypto_ctx_release_dtor(void *ctx)
265 {
266 bpf_crypto_ctx_release(ctx);
267 }
268 CFI_NOSEAL(bpf_crypto_ctx_release_dtor);
269
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki