Thread (19 messages) 19 messages, 3 authors, 2026-01-10

Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 08/15] net/nebula-matrix: add vsi, queue, adminq resource definitions and implementation

From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Date: 2026-01-09 18:39:08
Also in: linux-doc, lkml

+static s32 nbl_res_aq_get_module_bitrate(struct nbl_resource_mgt *res_mgt,
+					 u8 eth_id)
+{
+	struct device *dev = NBL_COMMON_TO_DEV(res_mgt->common);
+	struct nbl_eth_info *eth_info = NBL_RES_MGT_TO_ETH_INFO(res_mgt);
+	u8 data[SFF_8472_SIGNALING_RATE_MAX + 1];
+	u32 result;
+	u8 br_nom;
+	u8 br_max;
+	u8 identifier;
+	u8 encoding = 0;
+	int port_max_rate;
+	int ret;
+
+	if (res_mgt->resource_info->board_info.eth_speed ==
+	    NBL_FW_PORT_SPEED_100G) {
+		ret = nbl_res_aq_turn_module_eeprom_page(res_mgt, eth_id, 0);
+		if (ret) {
+			dev_err(dev,
+				"eth %d get_module_eeprom_info failed %d\n",
+				eth_info->logic_eth_id[eth_id], ret);
+			return NBL_PORT_MAX_RATE_UNKNOWN;
+		}
+	}
+
+	ret = nbl_res_aq_get_module_eeprom(res_mgt, eth_id, I2C_DEV_ADDR_A0, 0,
+					   0, 0,
+					   SFF_8472_SIGNALING_RATE_MAX + 1,
+					   data);
+	if (ret) {
+		dev_err(dev, "eth %d get_module_eeprom_info failed %d\n",
+			eth_info->logic_eth_id[eth_id], ret);
+		return NBL_PORT_MAX_RATE_UNKNOWN;
+	}
+
+	if (res_mgt->resource_info->board_info.eth_speed ==
+	    NBL_FW_PORT_SPEED_100G) {
+		ret = nbl_res_aq_get_module_eeprom(res_mgt, eth_id,
+						   I2C_DEV_ADDR_A0, 0, 0,
+						   SFF_8636_VENDOR_ENCODING, 1,
+						   &encoding);
+		if (ret) {
+			dev_err(dev,
+				"eth %d get_module_eeprom_info failed %d\n",
+				eth_info->logic_eth_id[eth_id], ret);
+			return NBL_PORT_MAX_RATE_UNKNOWN;
+		}
+	}
+
+	br_nom = data[SFF_8472_SIGNALING_RATE];
+	br_max = data[SFF_8472_SIGNALING_RATE_MAX];
+	identifier = data[SFF_8472_IDENTIFIER];
+
+	/* sff-8472 section 5.6 */
+	if (br_nom == 255)
+		result = (u32)br_max * 250;
+	else if (br_nom == 0)
+		result = 0;
+	else
+		result = (u32)br_nom * 100;
+
+	switch (result / 1000) {
+	case 25:
+		port_max_rate = NBL_PORT_MAX_RATE_25G;
+		break;
+	case 10:
+		port_max_rate = NBL_PORT_MAX_RATE_10G;
+		break;
+	case 1:
+		port_max_rate = NBL_PORT_MAX_RATE_1G;
+		break;
+	default:
+		port_max_rate = NBL_PORT_MAX_RATE_UNKNOWN;
+		break;
+	}
+
+	if (identifier == SFF_IDENTIFIER_QSFP28)
+		port_max_rate = NBL_PORT_MAX_RATE_100G;
+
+	if (identifier == SFF_IDENTIFIER_PAM4 ||
+	    encoding == SFF_8636_ENCODING_PAM4)
+		port_max_rate = NBL_PORT_MAX_RATE_100G_PAM4;
+
+	return port_max_rate;
+}
Please could you pull everything dealing with the SFP into a patch of
its own. We will want to review this code and think about if you
should be using phylink.

Do you also have a PCS which the driver is configuring? If so, please
make that a separate patch as well.

       Andrew
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help