Thread (13 messages) 13 messages, 3 authors, 2026-01-08

Re: [PATCH 3/5] drm/radeon: Raise msi_addr_mask to 40 bits for pre-Bonaire

From: Vivian Wang <hidden>
Date: 2026-01-08 06:42:03
Also in: amd-gfx, dri-devel, linux-pci, linux-sound, linuxppc-dev, lkml

On 1/7/26 23:20, Christian König wrote:
On 12/24/25 04:10, Vivian Wang wrote:
quoted
The code was originally written using no_64bit_msi, which restricts the
device to 32-bit MSI addresses.

Since msi_addr_mask is introduced, use DMA_BIT_MASK(40) instead of
DMA_BIT_MASK(32) here for msi_addr_mask, describing the restriction more
precisely and allowing these devices to work on platforms with MSI
doorbell address above 32-bit space, as long as it is within the
hardware restriction of 40-bit space.

Signed-off-by: Vivian Wang <redacted>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_irq_kms.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_irq_kms.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_irq_kms.c
index d550554a6f3f..ea519d43348b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_irq_kms.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_irq_kms.c
@@ -251,8 +251,8 @@ static bool radeon_msi_ok(struct radeon_device *rdev)
 	 * IBM POWER servers, so we limit them
 	 */
 	if (rdev->family < CHIP_BONAIRE) {
-		dev_info(rdev->dev, "radeon: MSI limited to 32-bit\n");
-		rdev->pdev->msi_addr_mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(32);
+		dev_info(rdev->dev, "radeon: MSI limited to 40-bit\n");
+		rdev->pdev->msi_addr_mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(40);
Well, that is not even remotely correct.

Please move that close to the dma_set_mask_and_coherent() call in radeon_device_init() (file radeon_device.c).

The check there is most likely already what you need. Should be pretty straight forward.
Thanks. In that case, maybe this msi_addr_mask thing was overcomplicated
after all. Maybe coherent_dma_mask is just the right thing to check anyway.

I'll see if I can figure something out. Of course I need to keep the
logic for Power still working...

Vivian "dramforever" Wang
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help