Re: [PATCH net v2] net/smc: fix one NULL pointer dereference in smc_ib_is_sg_need_sync()
From: "D. Wythe" <alibuda@linux.alibaba.com >
Date: 2026-01-26 04:45:11
Also in:
linux-rdma, linux-s390
On Tue, Sep 09, 2025 at 12:45:32PM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
On Thu, Aug 28, 2025 at 08:41:17PM +0800, Liu Jian wrote:quoted
BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 00000000000002ec PGD 0 P4D 0 Oops: Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI CPU: 28 UID: 0 PID: 343 Comm: kworker/28:1 Kdump: loaded Tainted: G OE 6.17.0-rc2+ #9 NONE Tainted: [O]=OOT_MODULE, [E]=UNSIGNED_MODULE Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.15.0-1 04/01/2014 Workqueue: smc_hs_wq smc_listen_work [smc] RIP: 0010:smc_ib_is_sg_need_sync+0x9e/0xd0 [smc] ... Call Trace: <TASK> smcr_buf_map_link+0x211/0x2a0 [smc] __smc_buf_create+0x522/0x970 [smc] smc_buf_create+0x3a/0x110 [smc] smc_find_rdma_v2_device_serv+0x18f/0x240 [smc] ? smc_vlan_by_tcpsk+0x7e/0xe0 [smc] smc_listen_find_device+0x1dd/0x2b0 [smc] smc_listen_work+0x30f/0x580 [smc] process_one_work+0x18c/0x340 worker_thread+0x242/0x360 kthread+0xe7/0x220 ret_from_fork+0x13a/0x160 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 </TASK> If the software RoCE device is used, ibdev->dma_device is a null pointer. As a result, the problem occurs. Null pointer detection is added to prevent problems. Fixes: 0ef69e788411c ("net/smc: optimize for smc_sndbuf_sync_sg_for_device and smc_rmb_sync_sg_for_cpu") Signed-off-by: Liu Jian <redacted> --- v1->v2: move the check outside of loop. net/smc/smc_ib.c | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)diff --git a/net/smc/smc_ib.c b/net/smc/smc_ib.c index 53828833a3f7..a42ef3f77b96 100644 --- a/net/smc/smc_ib.c +++ b/net/smc/smc_ib.c@@ -742,6 +742,9 @@ bool smc_ib_is_sg_need_sync(struct smc_link *lnk, unsigned int i; bool ret = false; + if (!lnk->smcibdev->ibdev->dma_device) + return ret;Please use ib_uses_virt_dma() function for that. It is clearly stated in the code: 2784 struct ib_device { 2785 /* Do not access @dma_device directly from ULP nor from HW drivers. */ 2786 struct device *dma_device; Thanks
Hi Leon,
Sorry for the late reply, I just noticed this and thank you for your review.
I agree completely with your feedback: we should not be accessing ibdev->dma_device
directly. Following your advice, replacing the
if (!lnk->smcibdev->ibdev->dma_device)
check with ib_uses_virt_dma() is straightforward and absolutely the correct
thing to do for that part of the logic.
However, this has led me to a further challenge. The main purpose of the
smc_ib_is_sg_need_sync() function is to get the result of dma_need_sync().
This means that even after correctly using ib_uses_virt_dma(), the function
still needs to call dma_need_sync(ibdev->dma_device, ...), which forces us
right back into the direct access pattern we are trying to eliminate.
Since the RDMA doesn't currently offer a helper for this "check" functionality,
I'd like to propose adding one. What are your thoughts on a new helper like
the one below, which would allow us to solve this cleanly?
/* ib_verbs.h */
static inline bool ib_dma_need_sync(struct ib_device *dev, dma_addr_t dma_addr) {
return !ib_uses_virt_dma(dev) && dma_need_sync(dev->dma_device, dma_addr);
}
Best wishes,
D. Wythe