Hi Andrew,

Sorry for the late reply. I recently started a new job and have been
busy.

On Tue Dec 23, 2025 at 6:43 PM KST, Andrew Lunn wrote:

It would be better to do range checks in rio_probe1() and call
netdev_err() and return -EINVAL?

Anybody trying to use very large values then gets an error message
rather than it working, but not as expected.

I was planning to add the range checks in rio_probe1() in the next merge
window to keep this patch small, but I agree it's better to include them now.
I'll send a v2 with the checks added.

Thanks for the review.

    Yeounsu Moon