On Wed, Dec 24, 2025 at 2:05 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski [off-list ref] wrote:

On 24/12/2025 11:30, Robert Marko wrote:

quoted

On Wed, Dec 24, 2025 at 11:21 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

On Tue, Dec 23, 2025 at 09:16:12PM +0100, Robert Marko wrote:

quoted

Add the required LAN969x clock bindings.

I do not see clock bindings actually here. Where is the actual binding?
Commit msg does not help me at all to understand why you are doing this
without actual required bindings.

I guess it is a bit confusing, there is no schema here, these are the
clock indexes that
reside in dt-bindings and are used by the SoC DTSI.

I understand as not used by drivers? Then no ABI and there is no point
in putting them into bindings.

It is not included by the driver directly, but it requires these exact
indexes to be passed
so its effectively ABI.
LAN966x does the same, but they differ in number of clocks and their indexes.

Regards,
Robert

Best regards,
Krzysztof

-- 
Robert Marko
Staff Embedded Linux Engineer
Sartura d.d.
Lendavska ulica 16a
10000 Zagreb, Croatia
Email: robert.marko@sartura.hr
Web: www.sartura.hr