Thread (60 messages) 60 messages, 7 authors, 2025-12-23

Re: [PATCH v2 05/19] dt-bindings: arm: microchip: move SparX-5 to generic Microchip binding

From: Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>
Date: 2025-12-16 18:50:15
Also in: dmaengine, linux-clk, linux-crypto, linux-devicetree, linux-gpio, linux-hwmon, linux-i2c, linux-serial, linux-spi, linux-usb, lkml

On Tue, Dec 16, 2025 at 06:01:02PM +0100, Robert Marko wrote:
On Tue, Dec 16, 2025 at 4:58 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On 15/12/2025 17:35, Robert Marko wrote:
quoted
Now that we have a generic Microchip binding, lets move SparX-5 as well as
there is no reason to have specific binding file for each SoC series.

The check for AXI node was dropped.
Why?
According to Conor, it is pointless [1]

[1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-arm-kernel/patch/20251203122313.1287950-2-robert.marko@sartura.hr/#26691879
Right, but you should say why it is being removed in the commit message.
There's probably a bunch of things you could cite for that, but mainly
it's just not something that is done for "simple-bus" devices. The
address they start at just doesn't matter for functionality and the node
itself does nothing without having children of its own (the presence of
which is enforced nowhere).

Attachments

Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help