Re: [PATCH net v3] vsock/virtio: cap TX credit to local buffer size
From: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
Date: 2025-12-11 13:15:59
Also in:
kvm, lkml, virtualization
On Thu, Dec 11, 2025 at 01:51:04PM +0100, Melbin K Mathew wrote:
The virtio vsock transport currently derives its TX credit directly from
peer_buf_alloc, which is populated from the remote endpoint's
SO_VM_SOCKETS_BUFFER_SIZE value.
On the host side, this means the amount of data we are willing to queue
for a given connection is scaled purely by a peer-chosen value, rather
than by the host's own vsock buffer configuration. A guest that
advertises a very large buffer and reads slowly can cause the host to
allocate a correspondingly large amount of sk_buff memory for that
connection.
In practice, a malicious guest can:
- set a large AF_VSOCK buffer size (e.g. 2 GiB) with
SO_VM_SOCKETS_BUFFER_MAX_SIZE / SO_VM_SOCKETS_BUFFER_SIZE, and
- open multiple connections to a host vsock service that sends data
while the guest drains slowly.
On an unconstrained host this can drive Slab/SUnreclaim into the tens of
GiB range, causing allocation failures and OOM kills in unrelated host
processes while the offending VM remains running.
On non-virtio transports and compatibility:
- VMCI uses the AF_VSOCK buffer knobs to size its queue pairs per
socket based on the local vsk->buffer_* values; the remote side
can’t enlarge those queues beyond what the local endpoint
configured.
- Hyper-V’s vsock transport uses fixed-size VMBus ring buffers and
an MTU bound; there is no peer-controlled credit field comparable
to peer_buf_alloc, and the remote endpoint can’t drive in-flight
kernel memory above those ring sizes.
- The loopback path reuses virtio_transport_common.c, so it
naturally follows the same semantics as the virtio transport.
Make virtio-vsock consistent with that model by intersecting the peer’s
advertised receive window with the local vsock buffer size when
computing TX credit. We introduce a small helper and use it in
virtio_transport_get_credit(), virtio_transport_has_space() and
virtio_transport_seqpacket_enqueue(), so that:
effective_tx_window = min(peer_buf_alloc, buf_alloc)
This prevents a remote endpoint from forcing us to queue more data than
our own configuration allows, while preserving the existing credit
semantics and keeping virtio-vsock compatible with the other transports.
On an unpatched Ubuntu 22.04 host (~64 GiB RAM), running a PoC with
32 guest vsock connections advertising 2 GiB each and reading slowly
drove Slab/SUnreclaim from ~0.5 GiB to ~57 GiB and the system only
recovered after killing the QEMU process.
With this patch applied, rerunning the same PoC yields:
Before:
MemFree: ~61.6 GiB
MemAvailable: ~62.3 GiB
Slab: ~142 MiB
SUnreclaim: ~117 MiB
After 32 high-credit connections:
MemFree: ~61.5 GiB
MemAvailable: ~62.3 GiB
Slab: ~178 MiB
SUnreclaim: ~152 MiB
i.e. only ~35 MiB increase in Slab/SUnreclaim, no host OOM, and the
guest remains responsive.
Fixes: 06a8fc78367d ("VSOCK: Introduce virtio_vsock_common.ko")
Suggested-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Melbin K Mathew <redacted>
---
net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)Changes LGTM, but the patch seems corrupted. $ git am ./v3_20251211_mlbnkm1_vsock_virtio_cap_tx_credit_to_local_buffer_size.mbx Applying: vsock/virtio: cap TX credit to local buffer size error: corrupt patch at line 29 Patch failed at 0001 vsock/virtio: cap TX credit to local buffer size See also https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/patch/20251211125104.375020-1-mlbnkm1@gmail.com/ Stefano
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c index dcc8a1d58..02eeb96dd 100644 --- a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c +++ b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c@@ -491,6 +491,25 @@ void virtio_transport_consume_skb_sent(struct sk_buff *skb, bool consume)} EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(virtio_transport_consume_skb_sent); +/* Return the effective peer buffer size for TX credit computation. + * + * The peer advertises its receive buffer via peer_buf_alloc, but we + * cap that to our local buf_alloc (derived from + * SO_VM_SOCKETS_BUFFER_SIZE and already clamped to buffer_max_size) + * so that a remote endpoint cannot force us to queue more data than + * our own configuration allows. + */ +static u32 virtio_transport_tx_buf_alloc(struct virtio_vsock_sock *vvs) +{ + return min(vvs->peer_buf_alloc, vvs->buf_alloc); +} + u32 virtio_transport_get_credit(struct virtio_vsock_sock *vvs, u32 credit) { u32 ret;@@ -499,7 +518,8 @@ u32 virtio_transport_get_credit(struct virtio_vsock_sock *vvs, u32 credit)return 0; spin_lock_bh(&vvs->tx_lock); - ret = vvs->peer_buf_alloc - (vvs->tx_cnt - vvs->peer_fwd_cnt); + ret = virtio_transport_tx_buf_alloc(vvs) - + (vvs->tx_cnt - vvs->peer_fwd_cnt); if (ret > credit) ret = credit; vvs->tx_cnt += ret;@@ -831,7 +851,7 @@ virtio_transport_seqpacket_enqueue(struct vsock_sock *vsk,spin_lock_bh(&vvs->tx_lock); - if (len > vvs->peer_buf_alloc) { + if (len > virtio_transport_tx_buf_alloc(vvs)) { spin_unlock_bh(&vvs->tx_lock); return -EMSGSIZE; }@@ -882,7 +902,8 @@ static s64 virtio_transport_has_space(struct vsock_sock *vsk)struct virtio_vsock_sock *vvs = vsk->trans; s64 bytes; - bytes = (s64)vvs->peer_buf_alloc - (vvs->tx_cnt - vvs->peer_fwd_cnt); + bytes = (s64)virtio_transport_tx_buf_alloc(vvs) - + (vvs->tx_cnt - vvs->peer_fwd_cnt); if (bytes < 0) bytes = 0; -- 2.34.1