Thread (38 messages) 38 messages, 6 authors, 2025-12-10

Re: [PATCH v3 20/21] pmdomain: mediatek: Add bus protect control flow for MT8189

From: Irving-CH Lin (林建弘) <hidden>
Date: 2025-12-10 10:45:43
Also in: linux-arm-kernel, linux-clk, linux-devicetree, linux-mediatek, linux-pm, lkml

Hi Angelo,

On Fri, 2025-11-07 at 11:36 +0100, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
External email : Please do not click links or open attachments until
you have verified the sender or the content.


Il 06/11/25 13:42, irving.ch.lin ha scritto:
quoted
From: Irving-CH Lin <redacted>

In MT8189 mminfra power domain, the bus protect policy separates
into two parts, one is set before subsys clocks enabled, and
another
need to enable after subsys clocks enable.

Signed-off-by: Irving-CH Lin <redacted>
---
  drivers/pmdomain/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.c | 31
++++++++++++++++++----
  drivers/pmdomain/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.h |  5 ++++
  2 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pmdomain/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.c
b/drivers/pmdomain/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.c
index 164c6b519af3..222846e52daf 100644
--- a/drivers/pmdomain/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.c
+++ b/drivers/pmdomain/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.c
@@ -250,7 +250,7 @@ static int scpsys_bus_protect_set(struct
scpsys_domain *pd,
                                      MTK_POLL_DELAY_US,
MTK_POLL_TIMEOUT);
  }

-static int scpsys_bus_protect_enable(struct scpsys_domain *pd)
+static int scpsys_bus_protect_enable(struct scpsys_domain *pd, u8
flags)
  {
      for (int i = 0; i < SPM_MAX_BUS_PROT_DATA; i++) {
              const struct scpsys_bus_prot_data *bpd = &pd->data-
quoted
bp_cfg[i];
@@ -259,6 +259,10 @@ static int scpsys_bus_protect_enable(struct
scpsys_domain *pd)
              if (!bpd->bus_prot_set_clr_mask)
                      break;

+             if ((bpd->flags & BUS_PROT_IGNORE_SUBCLK) !=
+                 (flags & BUS_PROT_IGNORE_SUBCLK))
+                     continue;
+
              if (bpd->flags & BUS_PROT_INVERTED)
                      ret = scpsys_bus_protect_clear(pd, bpd);
              else
@@ -270,7 +274,7 @@ static int scpsys_bus_protect_enable(struct
scpsys_domain *pd)
      return 0;
  }

-static int scpsys_bus_protect_disable(struct scpsys_domain *pd)
+static int scpsys_bus_protect_disable(struct scpsys_domain *pd, u8
flags)
  {
      for (int i = SPM_MAX_BUS_PROT_DATA - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
              const struct scpsys_bus_prot_data *bpd = &pd->data-
quoted
bp_cfg[i];
@@ -279,6 +283,10 @@ static int scpsys_bus_protect_disable(struct
scpsys_domain *pd)
              if (!bpd->bus_prot_set_clr_mask)
                      continue;

+             if ((bpd->flags & BUS_PROT_IGNORE_SUBCLK) !=
Is that the right name for this flag?

As far as I understand, you have to set bus protection in two steps,
right?
So in the first step you're setting bus protection for the MM_INFRA
and for
MM_INFRA_2ND - and in the second step you're setting MM_INFRA_IGN and
2_IGN.

So the first step (the prots with BUS_PROT_IGNORE_SUBCLK) unlocks
SUBSYS clks
and SRAM ISO access, the second one does the rest.

I think that a better name for this, at this point would be...

if ((bpd->flags & local_flags) & BUS_PROT_SRAM_PROTECTION)
        continue;

What do you think?

Regards,
Angelo
Yes, the purpose is to set bus with two steps:
In general case, bus protection needs to control after subsys clock
enabled. But on MT8189 MM_INFRA subsys, some bus protection set before
subsys clock enabled.

So here i name bus protection setting w/o subsys clock as
IGNORE_SUBCLK.

thanks

BR,
irving
quoted
+                 (flags & BUS_PROT_IGNORE_SUBCLK))
+                     continue;
+
              if (bpd->flags & BUS_PROT_INVERTED)
                      ret = scpsys_bus_protect_set(pd, bpd);
              else
@@ -632,6 +640,15 @@ static int scpsys_power_on(struct
generic_pm_domain *genpd)
      if (ret)
              goto err_pwr_ack;

+     /*
+      * In MT8189 mminfra power domain, the bus protect policy
separates
+      * into two parts, one is set before subsys clocks enabled,
and another
+      * need to enable after subsys clocks enable.
+      */
+     ret = scpsys_bus_protect_disable(pd, BUS_PROT_IGNORE_SUBCLK);
+     if (ret < 0)
+             goto err_pwr_ack;
+
      /*
       * In few Mediatek platforms(e.g. MT6779), the bus protect
policy is
       * stricter, which leads to bus protect release must be prior
to bus
@@ -648,7 +665,7 @@ static int scpsys_power_on(struct
generic_pm_domain *genpd)
      if (ret < 0)
              goto err_disable_subsys_clks;

-     ret = scpsys_bus_protect_disable(pd);
+     ret = scpsys_bus_protect_disable(pd, 0);
      if (ret < 0)
              goto err_disable_sram;
@@ -662,7 +679,7 @@ static int scpsys_power_on(struct
generic_pm_domain *genpd)
      return 0;

  err_enable_bus_protect:
-     scpsys_bus_protect_enable(pd);
+     scpsys_bus_protect_enable(pd, 0);
  err_disable_sram:
      scpsys_sram_disable(pd);
  err_disable_subsys_clks:
@@ -683,7 +700,7 @@ static int scpsys_power_off(struct
generic_pm_domain *genpd)
      bool tmp;
      int ret;

-     ret = scpsys_bus_protect_enable(pd);
+     ret = scpsys_bus_protect_enable(pd, 0);
      if (ret < 0)
              return ret;
@@ -697,6 +714,10 @@ static int scpsys_power_off(struct
generic_pm_domain *genpd)

      clk_bulk_disable_unprepare(pd->num_subsys_clks, pd-
quoted
subsys_clks);
+     ret = scpsys_bus_protect_enable(pd, BUS_PROT_IGNORE_SUBCLK);
+     if (ret < 0)
+             return ret;
+
      if (MTK_SCPD_CAPS(pd, MTK_SCPD_MODEM_PWRSEQ))
              scpsys_modem_pwrseq_off(pd);
      else
diff --git a/drivers/pmdomain/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.h
b/drivers/pmdomain/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.h
index f608e6ec4744..a5dca24cbc2f 100644
--- a/drivers/pmdomain/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.h
+++ b/drivers/pmdomain/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.h
@@ -56,6 +56,7 @@ enum scpsys_bus_prot_flags {
      BUS_PROT_REG_UPDATE = BIT(1),
      BUS_PROT_IGNORE_CLR_ACK = BIT(2),
      BUS_PROT_INVERTED = BIT(3),
+     BUS_PROT_IGNORE_SUBCLK = BIT(4),
  };

  enum scpsys_bus_prot_block {
@@ -95,6 +96,10 @@ enum scpsys_bus_prot_block {
              _BUS_PROT(_hwip, _mask, _set, _clr, _mask,
_sta,        \
                        BUS_PROT_REG_UPDATE)

+#define BUS_PROT_WR_IGN_SUBCLK(_hwip, _mask, _set, _clr,
_sta)               \
+             _BUS_PROT(_hwip, _mask, _set, _clr, _mask,
_sta,        \
+                       BUS_PROT_IGNORE_CLR_ACK |
BUS_PROT_IGNORE_SUBCLK)
+
  #define BUS_PROT_INFRA_UPDATE_TOPAXI(_mask)                 \
              BUS_PROT_UPDATE(INFRA, _mask,                   \
                              INFRA_TOPAXI_PROTECTEN,         \
  
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help