On 11/27/25 11:10 AM, Maxime Chevallier wrote:

On 27/11/2025 04:00, Jakub Kicinski wrote:

quoted

On Sat, 22 Nov 2025 13:42:59 +0100 Maxime Chevallier wrote:

quoted

This is v19 of the phy_port work. Patches 2 and 3 lack PHY maintainers reviews.

This v19 has no changes compared to v18, but patch 2 was rebased on top
of the recent 1.6T linkmodes.

Thanks for everyone's patience and reviews on that work ! Now, the
usual blurb for the series description.

Hopefully we can still make v6.19, but we hooked up Claude Code review
to patchwork this week, and it points out some legit issues here :(
Some look transient but others are definitely legit, please look thru
this:

https://netdev-ai.bots.linux.dev/ai-review.html?id=5388d317-98c9-458e-8655-d60f31112574

Is there a canonical way to reply to these reviews ? Some are good, some
aren't.

AFAIK there isn't yet a formalized process for that.

I'll summarize what I've done in the changelog, but it skips any
potential discussions that could've been triggered by these reviews. I
guess this is a matter of letting this process stabilize :)

If you have time it would be great if you could send an email to Chris
Mason (clm@meta.com) detailing the bad parts and why are incorrect.

Thanks,

Paolo