Re: [PATCH net-next] virtio-net: avoid unnecessary checksum calculation on guest RX
From: Jon Kohler <hidden>
Date: 2025-11-26 18:58:59
Also in:
lkml, virtualization
On Nov 26, 2025, at 6:16 AM, Paolo Abeni [off-list ref] wrote: On 11/25/25 9:00 PM, Jon Kohler wrote:quoted
quoted
On Nov 25, 2025, at 12:57 PM, Paolo Abeni [off-list ref] wrote: CC netdevThats odd, I used git send-email --to-cmd='./scripts/get_maintainer.pl, but it looks like in MAINTAINERS, that only would have hit VIRTIO CORE AND NET DRIVERS,?!? not here: ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl drivers/net/virtio_net.c "Michael S. Tsirkin" [off-list ref] (maintainer:VIRTIO CORE AND NET DRIVERS) Jason Wang [off-list ref] (maintainer:VIRTIO CORE AND NET DRIVERS) Xuan Zhuo [off-list ref] (reviewer:VIRTIO CORE AND NET DRIVERS) "Eugenio Pérez" [off-list ref] (reviewer:VIRTIO CORE AND NET DRIVERS) Andrew Lunn [off-list ref] (maintainer:NETWORKING DRIVERS) "David S. Miller" [off-list ref] (maintainer:NETWORKING DRIVERS) Eric Dumazet [off-list ref] (maintainer:NETWORKING DRIVERS) Jakub Kicinski [off-list ref] (maintainer:NETWORKING DRIVERS) Paolo Abeni [off-list ref] (maintainer:NETWORKING DRIVERS) virtualization@lists.linux.dev (open list:VIRTIO CORE AND NET DRIVERS) netdev@vger.kernel.org (open list:NETWORKING DRIVERS) linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (open list) The "NETWORKING DRIVER" entry should catch even virtio_net. Something odd in your setup?!?
Literally all I’ve got is a clone of net-next and using get_maintainer.pl but yea the issue is the header-only change. I have a knack for falling exactly into these sorts of process holes :) It’ll be a good cleanup anyhow
BTW, this is a bit too late, but you should wait at least 24h before reposting on netdev:
Thanks for the guidance again, I’ll be sure to pace things out if/when I find myself in this situation again! I appreciate the help