Re: [PATCH net-next v2 1/6] dpll: zl3073x: Store raw register values instead of parsed state
From: Vadim Fedorenko <vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev>
Date: 2025-11-12 21:52:18
Also in:
lkml
On 12/11/2025 19:24, Ivan Vecera wrote:
On 11/12/25 3:12 PM, Vadim Fedorenko wrote:quoted
On 11/11/2025 18:12, Ivan Vecera wrote:quoted
The zl3073x_ref, zl3073x_out and zl3073x_synth structures previously stored state that was parsed from register reads. This included values like boolean 'enabled' flags, synthesizer selections, and pre-calculated frequencies. This commit refactors the state management to store the raw register values directly in these structures. The various inline helper functions are updated to parse these raw values on-demand using FIELD_GET. Reviewed-by: Petr Oros <redacted> Tested-by: Prathosh Satish <Prathosh.Satish@microchip.com> Signed-off-by: Ivan Vecera <ivecera@redhat.com> --- drivers/dpll/zl3073x/core.c | 81 ++++++++++++------------------------- drivers/dpll/zl3073x/core.h | 61 ++++++++++++++++------------ 2 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 82 deletions(-)diff --git a/drivers/dpll/zl3073x/core.c b/drivers/dpll/zl3073x/core.c index e42e527813cf8..50c1fe59bc7f0 100644 --- a/drivers/dpll/zl3073x/core.c +++ b/drivers/dpll/zl3073x/core.c@@ -598,25 +598,22 @@ int zl3073x_write_hwreg_seq(struct zl3073x_dev*zldev, * @zldev: pointer to zl3073x_dev structure * @index: input reference index to fetch state for * - * Function fetches information for the given input reference that are - * invariant and stores them for later use. + * Function fetches state for the given input reference and stores it for + * later user. * * Return: 0 on success, <0 on error */ static int zl3073x_ref_state_fetch(struct zl3073x_dev *zldev, u8 index) { - struct zl3073x_ref *input = &zldev->ref[index]; - u8 ref_config; + struct zl3073x_ref *ref = &zldev->ref[index]; int rc; /* If the input is differential then the configuration for N-pin * reference is ignored and P-pin config is used for both. */ - if (zl3073x_is_n_pin(index) && - zl3073x_ref_is_diff(zldev, index - 1)) { - input->enabled = zl3073x_ref_is_enabled(zldev, index - 1); - input->diff = true; + if (zl3073x_is_n_pin(index) && zl3073x_ref_is_diff(zldev, index - 1)) { + memcpy(ref, &zldev->ref[index - 1], sizeof(*ref));Oh, it's not obvious from the code that it's actually safe, unless reviewer remembers that N-pins have only even indexes.Would it be helpful to add here the comment describing that is safe and why?
Yes, comment would be great to have.
quoted
Have you thought of adding an abstraction for differential pair pins?No, zl3073x_ref represents mailbox for HW reference... Here, I’m just following the datasheet, which states: "If the P-pin is marked as differential then some content of the mailbox for N-pin is ignored and is inherited from the P-pin". For now, the content of zl3073x_ref is the inherited one, but this may change in the future. The abstraction for differential pin pairs is actually handled in dpll.c, where only a single dpll_pin is registered for each such pair. Ivan