Re: [PATCH] net: rose: Prevent the use of freed digipeat
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Date: 2025-10-24 23:58:40
Also in:
linux-hams, lkml
On Fri, 24 Oct 2025 17:05:21 +0800 Lizhi Xu wrote:
There is no synchronization between the two timers, rose_t0timer_expiry and rose_timer_expiry. rose_timer_expiry() puts the neighbor when the rose state is ROSE_STATE_2. However, rose_t0timer_expiry() does initiate a restart request on the neighbor.
Read what reviewers tell you please. Kuniyuki already told you not to send patches in reply to existing threads.