Re: [PATCH V3] net: rose: Prevent the use of freed digipeat
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Date: 2025-10-24 11:50:08
Also in:
linux-hams, lkml
On Fri, Oct 24, 2025 at 2:39 AM Lizhi Xu [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
There is no synchronization between the two timers, rose_t0timer_expiry and rose_timer_expiry. rose_timer_expiry() puts the neighbor when the rose state is ROSE_STATE_2. However, rose_t0timer_expiry() does initiate a restart request on the neighbor. When rose_t0timer_expiry() accesses the released neighbor member digipeat, a UAF is triggered. To avoid this UAF, defer the put operation to rose_t0timer_expiry() and stop restarting t0timer after putting the neighbor. When putting the neighbor, set the neighbor to NULL. Setting neighbor to NULL prevents rose_t0timer_expiry() from restarting t0timer. syzbot reported a slab-use-after-free Read in ax25_find_cb. BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in ax25_find_cb+0x3b8/0x3f0 net/ax25/af_ax25.c:237 Read of size 1 at addr ffff888059c704c0 by task syz.6.2733/17200 Call Trace: ax25_find_cb+0x3b8/0x3f0 net/ax25/af_ax25.c:237 ax25_send_frame+0x157/0xb60 net/ax25/ax25_out.c:55 rose_send_frame+0xcc/0x2c0 net/rose/rose_link.c:106 rose_transmit_restart_request+0x1b8/0x240 net/rose/rose_link.c:198 rose_t0timer_expiry+0x1d/0x150 net/rose/rose_link.c:83 Freed by task 17183: kfree+0x2b8/0x6d0 mm/slub.c:6826 rose_neigh_put include/net/rose.h:165 [inline] rose_timer_expiry+0x537/0x630 net/rose/rose_timer.c:183 Fixes: d860d1faa6b2 ("net: rose: convert 'use' field to refcount_t") Reported-by: syzbot+caa052a0958a9146870d@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Signed-off-by: Lizhi Xu <redacted> --- V1 -> V2: Putting the neighbor stops t0timer from automatically starting V2 -> V3: add rose_neigh_putex for set rose neigh to NULL include/net/rose.h | 12 ++++++++++++ net/rose/rose_link.c | 5 +++++ 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+)diff --git a/include/net/rose.h b/include/net/rose.h index 2b5491bbf39a..33de310ba778 100644 --- a/include/net/rose.h +++ b/include/net/rose.h@@ -167,6 +167,18 @@ static inline void rose_neigh_put(struct rose_neigh *rose_neigh) } } +static inline void rose_neigh_putex(struct rose_neigh **roseneigh) +{ + struct rose_neigh *rose_neigh = *roseneigh; + if (refcount_dec_and_test(&rose_neigh->use)) { + if (rose_neigh->ax25) + ax25_cb_put(rose_neigh->ax25); + kfree(rose_neigh->digipeat); + kfree(rose_neigh); + *roseneigh = NULL; + } +}
You have not even compiled this patch. Also please carefully read Documentation/process/maintainer-netdev.rst Resending after review ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Allow at least 24 hours to pass between postings. This will ensure reviewers from all geographical locations have a chance to chime in. Do not wait too long (weeks) between postings either as it will make it harder for reviewers to recall all the context. Make sure you address all the feedback in your new posting. Do not post a new version of the code if the discussion about the previous version is still ongoing, unless directly instructed by a reviewer. The new version of patches should be posted as a separate thread, not as a reply to the previous posting. Change log should include a link to the previous posting (see :ref:`Changes requested`).