[PATCH V2] netrom: Prevent race conditions between multiple add route
From: Lizhi Xu <hidden>
Date: 2025-10-20 13:35:14
Also in:
linux-hams, lkml
From: Lizhi Xu <hidden>
Date: 2025-10-20 13:35:14
Also in:
linux-hams, lkml
On Mon, 20 Oct 2025 15:25:40 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
Task0 Task1 Task2
===== ===== =====
[97] nr_add_node()
[113] nr_neigh_get_dev() [97] nr_add_node()
[214] nr_node_lock()
[245] nr_node->routes[2].neighbour->count--
[246] nr_neigh_put(nr_node->routes[2].neighbour);
[248] nr_remove_neigh(nr_node->routes[2].neighbour)
[283] nr_node_unlock()
[214] nr_node_lock()
[253] nr_node->routes[2].neighbour = nr_neigh
[254] nr_neigh_hold(nr_neigh); [97] nr_add_node()
[XXX] nr_neigh_put()
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
These charts are supposed to be chronological so [XXX] is wrong because the
use after free happens on line [248]. Do we really need three threads to
make this race work?The UAF problem occurs in Task2. Task1 sets the refcount of nr_neigh to 1, then Task0 adds it to routes[2]. Task2 releases routes[2].neighbour after executing [XXX]nr_neigh_put(). BR, Lizhi