Re: [RFC PATCH] mm: net: disable kswapd for high-order network buffer allocation
From: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>
Date: 2025-10-14 14:38:16
Also in:
linux-doc, linux-mm, lkml
On Tue, Oct 14, 2025 at 06:19:05PM +0800, Barry Song wrote:
quoted
quoted
quoted
I think you are missing something to control how much memory can be pushed on each TCP socket ? What is tcp_wmem on your phones ? What about tcp_mem ? Have you looked at /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_notsent_lowat# cat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_wmem 524288 1048576 6710886Ouch. That is insane tcp_wmem[0] . Please stick to 4096, or risk OOM of various sorts.quoted
# cat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_notsent_lowat 4294967295 Any thoughts on these settings?Please look at https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/networking/ip-sysctl.txt tcp_notsent_lowat - UNSIGNED INTEGER A TCP socket can control the amount of unsent bytes in its write queue, thanks to TCP_NOTSENT_LOWAT socket option. poll()/select()/epoll() reports POLLOUT events if the amount of unsent bytes is below a per socket value, and if the write queue is not full. sendmsg() will also not add new buffers if the limit is hit. This global variable controls the amount of unsent data for sockets not using TCP_NOTSENT_LOWAT. For these sockets, a change to the global variable has immediate effect. Setting this sysctl to 2MB can effectively reduce the amount of memory in TCP write queues by 66 %, or allow you to increase tcp_wmem[2] so that only flows needing big BDP can get it.We obtained these settings from our hardware vendors. It might be worth exploring these settings further, but I can’t quite see their connection to high-order allocations,
I don't think there is a connection between them. Is there a reason you are expecting a connection/relation between them?