Thread (37 messages) 37 messages, 5 authors, 2025-10-23

Re: [PATCH net-next v4 00/24][pull request] Queue configs and large buffer providers

From: Mina Almasry <hidden>
Date: 2025-10-14 04:41:52
Also in: linux-doc, linux-rdma, lkml

On Mon, Oct 13, 2025 at 10:54 AM Jakub Kicinski [off-list ref] wrote:
On Mon, 13 Oct 2025 15:54:02 +0100 Pavel Begunkov wrote:
quoted
Jakub Kicinski (20):
  docs: ethtool: document that rx_buf_len must control payload lengths
  net: ethtool: report max value for rx-buf-len
  net: use zero value to restore rx_buf_len to default
  net: clarify the meaning of netdev_config members
  net: add rx_buf_len to netdev config
  eth: bnxt: read the page size from the adapter struct
  eth: bnxt: set page pool page order based on rx_page_size
  eth: bnxt: support setting size of agg buffers via ethtool
  net: move netdev_config manipulation to dedicated helpers
  net: reduce indent of struct netdev_queue_mgmt_ops members
  net: allocate per-queue config structs and pass them thru the queue
    API
  net: pass extack to netdev_rx_queue_restart()
  net: add queue config validation callback
  eth: bnxt: always set the queue mgmt ops
  eth: bnxt: store the rx buf size per queue
  eth: bnxt: adjust the fill level of agg queues with larger buffers
  netdev: add support for setting rx-buf-len per queue
  net: wipe the setting of deactived queues
  eth: bnxt: use queue op config validate
  eth: bnxt: support per queue configuration of rx-buf-len
I'd like to rework these a little bit.
On reflection I don't like the single size control.
Please hold off.
FWIW when I last looked at this I didn't like that the size control
seemed to control the size of the allocations made from the pp, but
not the size actually posted to the NIC.

I.e. in the scenario where the driver fragments each pp buffer into 2,
and the user asks for 8K rx-buf-len, the size actually posted to the
NIC would have actually been 4K (8K / 2 for 2 fragments).

Not sure how much of a concern this really is. I thought it would be
great if somehow rx-buf-len controlled the buffer sizes actually
posted to the NIC, because that what ultimately matters, no (it ends
up being the size of the incoming frags)? Or does that not matter for
some reason I'm missing?

-- 
Thanks,
Mina
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help