Thread (10 messages) 10 messages, 3 authors, 2025-09-17
STALE315d
Revisions (6)
  1. v1 [diff vs current]
  2. v2 [diff vs current]
  3. v7 [diff vs current]
  4. v8 current
  5. v9 [diff vs current]
  6. v10 [diff vs current]

[PATCH v8 bpf-next/net 4/6] bpf: Support bpf_setsockopt() for BPF_CGROUP_INET_SOCK_CREATE.

From: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@google.com>
Date: 2025-09-10 19:21:08
Also in: bpf
Subsystem: bpf [general] (safe dynamic programs and tools), bpf [networking] (tcx & tc bpf, sock_addr), networking [general], the rest · Maintainers: Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann, Andrii Nakryiko, Eduard Zingerman, Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi, "David S. Miller", Eric Dumazet, Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni, Linus Torvalds

We will support flagging SK_MEMCG_EXCLUSIVE via bpf_setsockopt() at
the BPF_CGROUP_INET_SOCK_CREATE hook.

BPF_CGROUP_INET_SOCK_CREATE is invoked by __cgroup_bpf_run_filter_sk()
that passes a pointer to struct sock to the bpf prog as void *ctx.

But there are no bpf_func_proto for bpf_setsockopt() that receives
the ctx as a pointer to struct sock.

Also, bpf_getsockopt() will be necessary for a cgroup with multiple
bpf progs running.

Let's add new bpf_setsockopt() and bpf_getsockopt() variants for
BPF_CGROUP_INET_SOCK_CREATE.

Note that inet_create() is not under lock_sock() and has the same
semantics with bpf_lsm_unlocked_sockopt_hooks.

Signed-off-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@google.com>
---
v5: Rename new variants to bpf_sock_create_{get,set}sockopt().
v4:
  * Use __bpf_setsockopt() instead of _bpf_setsockopt()
  * Add getsockopt() for a cgroup with multiple bpf progs running
v3: Remove bpf_func_proto for accept()
v2: Make 2 new bpf_func_proto static
---
 net/core/filter.c | 48 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 48 insertions(+)
diff --git a/net/core/filter.c b/net/core/filter.c
index 63f3baee2daf..31b259f02ee9 100644
--- a/net/core/filter.c
+++ b/net/core/filter.c
@@ -5723,6 +5723,40 @@ static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_sock_addr_getsockopt_proto = {
 	.arg5_type	= ARG_CONST_SIZE,
 };
 
+BPF_CALL_5(bpf_sock_create_setsockopt, struct sock *, sk, int, level,
+	   int, optname, char *, optval, int, optlen)
+{
+	return __bpf_setsockopt(sk, level, optname, optval, optlen);
+}
+
+static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_sock_create_setsockopt_proto = {
+	.func		= bpf_sock_create_setsockopt,
+	.gpl_only	= false,
+	.ret_type	= RET_INTEGER,
+	.arg1_type	= ARG_PTR_TO_CTX,
+	.arg2_type	= ARG_ANYTHING,
+	.arg3_type	= ARG_ANYTHING,
+	.arg4_type	= ARG_PTR_TO_MEM | MEM_RDONLY,
+	.arg5_type	= ARG_CONST_SIZE,
+};
+
+BPF_CALL_5(bpf_sock_create_getsockopt, struct sock *, sk, int, level,
+	   int, optname, char *, optval, int, optlen)
+{
+	return __bpf_getsockopt(sk, level, optname, optval, optlen);
+}
+
+static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_sock_create_getsockopt_proto = {
+	.func		= bpf_sock_create_getsockopt,
+	.gpl_only	= false,
+	.ret_type	= RET_INTEGER,
+	.arg1_type	= ARG_PTR_TO_CTX,
+	.arg2_type	= ARG_ANYTHING,
+	.arg3_type	= ARG_ANYTHING,
+	.arg4_type	= ARG_PTR_TO_UNINIT_MEM,
+	.arg5_type	= ARG_CONST_SIZE,
+};
+
 BPF_CALL_5(bpf_sock_ops_setsockopt, struct bpf_sock_ops_kern *, bpf_sock,
 	   int, level, int, optname, char *, optval, int, optlen)
 {
@@ -8051,6 +8085,20 @@ sock_filter_func_proto(enum bpf_func_id func_id, const struct bpf_prog *prog)
 		return &bpf_sk_storage_get_cg_sock_proto;
 	case BPF_FUNC_ktime_get_coarse_ns:
 		return &bpf_ktime_get_coarse_ns_proto;
+	case BPF_FUNC_setsockopt:
+		switch (prog->expected_attach_type) {
+		case BPF_CGROUP_INET_SOCK_CREATE:
+			return &bpf_sock_create_setsockopt_proto;
+		default:
+			return NULL;
+		}
+	case BPF_FUNC_getsockopt:
+		switch (prog->expected_attach_type) {
+		case BPF_CGROUP_INET_SOCK_CREATE:
+			return &bpf_sock_create_getsockopt_proto;
+		default:
+			return NULL;
+		}
 	default:
 		return bpf_base_func_proto(func_id, prog);
 	}
-- 
2.51.0.384.g4c02a37b29-goog
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help