Thread (37 messages) 37 messages, 4 authors, 2025-10-11

Re: [PATCH net-next v5 0/8] TUN/TAP & vhost_net: netdev queue flow control to avoid ptr_ring tail drop

From: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Date: 2025-09-24 08:08:49
Also in: kvm, lkml, virtualization

On Wed, Sep 24, 2025 at 3:42 PM Michael S. Tsirkin [off-list ref] wrote:
On Wed, Sep 24, 2025 at 03:33:08PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
quoted
On Wed, Sep 24, 2025 at 3:18 PM Michael S. Tsirkin [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On Tue, Sep 23, 2025 at 12:15:45AM +0200, Simon Schippers wrote:
quoted
This patch series deals with TUN, TAP and vhost_net which drop incoming
SKBs whenever their internal ptr_ring buffer is full. Instead, with this
patch series, the associated netdev queue is stopped before this happens.
This allows the connected qdisc to function correctly as reported by [1]
and improves application-layer performance, see our paper [2]. Meanwhile
the theoretical performance differs only slightly:

About this whole approach.
What if userspace is not consuming packets?
Won't the watchdog warnings appear?
Is it safe to allow userspace to block a tx queue
indefinitely?
I think it's safe as it's a userspace device, there's no way to
guarantee the userspace can process the packet in time (so no watchdog
for TUN).

Thanks
Hmm. Anyway, I guess if we ever want to enable timeout for tun,
we can worry about it then.
The problem is that the skb is freed until userspace calls recvmsg(),
so it would be tricky to implement a watchdog. (Or if we can do, we
can do BQL as well).
Does not need to block this patchset.
Yes.

Thanks
quoted
quoted
--
MST
  
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help