[PATCH v2 02/16] ACPI: property: Use ACPI functions in acpi_graph_get_next_endpoint() only
From: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>
Date: 2025-09-24 07:46:19
Also in:
linux-acpi, linux-input, linux-leds, linux-media, linux-spi, lkml
Subsystem:
acpi, the rest · Maintainers:
"Rafael J. Wysocki", Linus Torvalds
Calling fwnode_get_next_child_node() in ACPI implementation of the fwnode property API is somewhat problematic as the latter is used in the impelementation of the former. Instead of using fwnode_get_next_child_node() in acpi_graph_get_next_endpoint(), call acpi_get_next_subnode() directly instead. Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com> --- drivers/acpi/property.c | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/property.c b/drivers/acpi/property.c
index 5435628c67e7..3e85900080ac 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/property.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/property.c@@ -1381,7 +1381,7 @@ static struct fwnode_handle *acpi_graph_get_next_endpoint( if (!prev) { do { - port = fwnode_get_next_child_node(fwnode, port); + port = acpi_get_next_subnode(fwnode, port); /* * The names of the port nodes begin with "port@" * followed by the number of the port node and they also
@@ -1399,13 +1399,13 @@ static struct fwnode_handle *acpi_graph_get_next_endpoint( if (!port) return NULL; - endpoint = fwnode_get_next_child_node(port, prev); + endpoint = acpi_get_next_subnode(port, prev); while (!endpoint) { - port = fwnode_get_next_child_node(fwnode, port); + port = acpi_get_next_subnode(fwnode, port); if (!port) break; if (is_acpi_graph_node(port, "port")) - endpoint = fwnode_get_next_child_node(port, NULL); + endpoint = acpi_get_next_subnode(port, NULL); } /*
--
2.47.3