Re: [PATCH] r8169: enable ASPM on Dell platforms
From: "Chia-Lin Kao (AceLan)" <acelan.kao@canonical.com>
Date: 2025-09-15 01:43:28
Also in:
lkml
On Fri, Sep 12, 2025 at 05:30:52PM +0200, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
On 9/12/2025 9:29 AM, Chia-Lin Kao (AceLan) wrote:quoted
Enable PCIe ASPM for RTL8169 NICs on Dell platforms that have been verified to work reliably with this power management feature. The r8169 driver traditionally disables ASPM to prevent random link failures and system hangs on problematic hardware. Dell has validated these product families to work correctly with RTL NIC ASPM and commits to addressing any ASPM-related issues with RTL hardware in collaboration with Realtek. This change enables ASPM for the following Dell product families: - Alienware - Dell Laptops/Pro Laptops/Pro Max Laptops - Dell Desktops/Pro Desktops/Pro Max Desktops - Dell Pro Rugged LaptopsI'd like to avoid DMI-based whitelists in kernel code. If more system vendors do it the same way, then this becomes hard to maintain.
I totally understand your point; I also don’t like constantly adding DMI info to the list. But this list isn’t for a single product name, it’s a product family that covers a series of products, and it probably won’t change anytime soon.
There is already a mechanism for vendors to flag that they successfully
tested ASPM. See c217ab7a3961 ("r8169: enable ASPM L1.2 if system vendor
flags it as safe").Right, but writing the flag is not applicable for Dell manufacturing processes.
Last but not least ASPM can be (re-)enabled from userspace, using sysfs.
That doesn't sound like a good solution to push the list to userspace. Dell has already been working with Canonical for more than a decade to ship their products with r8169 ASPM enabled. Dell has also had lengthy discussions with Realtek to have this feature enabled by default in the r8169 driver. I think this is a good opportunity for Dell to work with Realtek to spot bugs and refine the r8169 driver. BTW, I found the dmi.h header file is missing in the patch, so I submitted a v2 patch. https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20250915013555.365230-1-acelan.kao@canonical.com/T/#u (local)
quoted
Signed-off-by: Chia-Lin Kao (AceLan) <acelan.kao@canonical.com> --- drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+)diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c index 9c601f271c02..63e83cf071de 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c@@ -5366,6 +5366,32 @@ static void rtl_init_mac_address(struct rtl8169_private *tp) rtl_rar_set(tp, mac_addr); } +bool rtl_aspm_new_dell_platforms(void) +{ + const char *family = dmi_get_system_info(DMI_PRODUCT_FAMILY); + static const char * const dell_product_families[] = { + "Alienware", + "Dell Laptops", + "Dell Pro Laptops", + "Dell Pro Max Laptops", + "Dell Desktops", + "Dell Pro Desktops", + "Dell Pro Max Desktops", + "Dell Pro Rugged Laptops" + }; + int i; + + if (!family) + return false; + + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(dell_product_families); i++) { + if (str_has_prefix(family, dell_product_families[i])) + return true; + } + + return false; +} + /* register is set if system vendor successfully tested ASPM 1.2 */ static bool rtl_aspm_is_safe(struct rtl8169_private *tp) {@@ -5373,6 +5399,9 @@ static bool rtl_aspm_is_safe(struct rtl8169_private *tp) r8168_mac_ocp_read(tp, 0xc0b2) & 0xf) return true; + if (rtl_aspm_new_dell_platforms()) + return true; + return false; }