On Mon, Aug 25, 2025 at 11:07:24PM +0900, Tetsuo Handa wrote:

syzbot is reporting

  unregister_netdevice: waiting for vcan0 to become free. Usage count = 2

problem, for j1939 protocol did not have NETDEV_UNREGISTER notification
handler for undoing changes made by j1939_sk_bind().

Commit 25fe97cb7620 ("can: j1939: move j1939_priv_put() into sk_destruct
callback") expects that a call to j1939_priv_put() can be unconditionally
delayed until j1939_sk_sock_destruct() is called. But we need to call
j1939_priv_put() against an extra ref held by j1939_sk_bind() call
(as a part of undoing changes made by j1939_sk_bind()) as soon as
NETDEV_UNREGISTER notification fires (i.e. before j1939_sk_sock_destruct()
is called via j1939_sk_release()). Otherwise, the extra ref on "struct
j1939_priv" held by j1939_sk_bind() call prevents "struct net_device" from
dropping the usage count to 1; making it impossible for
unregister_netdevice() to continue.

Reported-by: syzbot <redacted>
Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=881d65229ca4f9ae8c84
Tested-by: syzbot <redacted>
Fixes: 9d71dd0c7009 ("can: add support of SAE J1939 protocol")
Fixes: 25fe97cb7620 ("can: j1939: move j1939_priv_put() into sk_destruct callback")
Signed-off-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>

Tested-by: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>
Acked-by: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>

Thank you!
-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Steuerwalder Str. 21                       | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany                  | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |