Re: [BUG] [ROSE] slab-use-after-free in lock_timer_base
From: F6BVP <hidden>
Date: 2025-09-03 10:11:46
Also in:
linux-hams
From: F6BVP <hidden>
Date: 2025-09-03 10:11:46
Also in:
linux-hams
I am confused for not having CC Takamisu Iwai. I apologize for this novice error. Considering the syzreport report I just wanted to add my contribution to provide a way to easily reproduce the bug when performing rose network. Le 03/09/2025 à 12:01, Eric Dumazet a écrit :
On Wed, Sep 3, 2025 at 2:51 AM Bernard Pidoux [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On 6.16.4 kernel patched with last ROSE commit for refcount use rose_remove_node() is causing refcount_t: underflow; use-after-free List: linux-stable-commits Subject: Patch "net: rose: split remove and free operations in rose_remove_neigh()" has been added to the 6.1 From: Sasha Levin <sashal () kernel ! org> Date: 2025-08-30 20:20:24 Message-ID: 20250830202024.2485006-1-sashal () kernel ! org Bernard Pidoux F6BVP / AI7BGAny particular reason you do not CC the author ? CC Takamitsu Iwai [off-list ref] BTW, a syzbot report was already sent to the list. https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=7287222a6d88bdb559a7